Electric Potential: V = IR Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between electric potential and Ohm's Law, emphasizing that electric potential (V) is inversely proportional to distance (1/d) and dependent on the source charge, while Ohm's Law (V = IR) describes the behavior of current in a material. Participants noted that Ohm's Law is a material property and cannot be derived from the laws governing point charges. The conversation also highlighted the importance of understanding the relationship between electric fields and potential, particularly in uniform fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and point charges
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of electric fields and their properties
  • Concept of uniform electric fields and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the microscopic Ohm's Law as detailed in HyperPhysics
  • Study the relationship between electric fields and potential differences
  • Explore the implications of material properties on electrical conductivity
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of electric potential from point charges
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electric potential and circuit behavior will benefit from this discussion.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Electric potential goes like the inverse of distance squared and the product of the two charges. But I can't see how this can produce V = IR.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
touqra said:
Electric potential goes like the inverse of distance squared and the product of the two charges. But I can't see how this can produce V = IR.

The relationship is very remote ! The first you cite is the potential of a *point charge in space*. The second (ohm's law) is the relationship between the motion and the potential distribution of a whole collection of charges within a certain material (which will have its influence on the dynamics).
Ohm's law is a material property (which doesn't always hold, btw), a bit like Hooke's law for the elastic behaviour of materials, while the first law you cited is more like, say, the law of Newtonian gravitation. You cannot derive Hooke's law from Newton's law of gravitation either.
 
touqra said:
Electric potential goes like the inverse of distance squared and the product of the two charges. But I can't see how this can produce V = IR.

The last time I saw, the potential went like one over distance (not squared!) and depended only on the source charge. What you say is true for the force between two point charges, though.
 
neutrino said:
The last time I saw, the potential went like one over distance (not squared!) and depended only on the source charge. What you say is true for the force between two point charges, though.

Ooops. I typed too fast. 1/distance squared for electric force. 1/distance for potential.
 
It might be good to review the microscopic Ohm's Law:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ohmmic.html
although this presentation doesn't address the relevant issues in the order needed to address the OP.

As a first step, recall that when the electric field is uniform, the electric potential varies linearly with distance.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K