Electrical energy transmission is on the inside or outside of a conductor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of electrical energy transmission in conductors, specifically whether energy is transmitted inside or outside of the conductor, even at low frequencies such as 50 Hz. Participants explore theoretical implications and practical considerations related to this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that energy transmission occurs outside the conductor, referencing the Poynting vector and its relevance to Maxwell's Equations.
  • Others argue that the skin depth in copper allows electric current to be carried throughout the cross section of typical wires, suggesting that energy is transmitted within the conductor.
  • A participant clarifies that the original question pertains to energy transmission rather than current, emphasizing the importance of understanding the distinction.
  • There is a discussion about the role of dielectrics in coaxial cables, with some noting that energy is transmitted in the electric field around the conductor, highlighting the significance of dielectric quality at high frequencies.
  • One participant reflects on the complexities of the question, suggesting that while circuit problems can often be treated without a definitive stance on energy transmission, losses in conductors can be relevant in certain contexts.
  • Another participant mentions that medium and low frequency radio waves behave in a way that suggests their interaction with the ground is influenced by losses, which affects their propagation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether energy is transmitted inside or outside of conductors, with no consensus reached. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the question of energy transmission involves complex models and assumptions, and that different contexts (such as circuit analysis versus wave propagation) may lead to different interpretations of the phenomenon.

bachir1994
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Hi,
Is it true that the transmission of energy is not inside an electrical conductor, but outside the metal. this even for frequencies around 50 hertz.
Thank's
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector

However, we teach that to students who are studying Maxwell's Equations. We do not mention it to students studying circuit analysis, because it makes no difference at that level and it would only serve to confuse.
 
Untrue. The skin depth in copper is about 3 cm at 50Hz, so electric current is carried throughout the cross section of any typical wire.
 
marcusl said:
Untrue. The skin depth in copper is about 3 cm at 50Hz, so electric current is carried throughout the cross section of any typical wire.

He didn't ask about the current, but rather the energy. Read the Wikipedia article.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
anorlunda said:
Yes, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector

However, we teach that to students who are studying Maxwell's Equations. We do not mention it to students studying circuit analysis, because it makes no difference at that level and it would only serve to confuse.

Thank you anorlunda for your very clear explanation, that's why the quality of the dielectric in a coaxial cable, support for high frequency energy, is very important. Moreover, under your control, at ultra high frequency, several Ghz, the central conductor become unnecessary, it is called in this case the waveguide
 
anorlunda said:
He didn't ask about the current, but rather the energy. Read the Wikipedia article.
Sorry, my mistake.
 
bachir1994 said:
that's why the quality of the dielectric in a coaxial cable, support for high frequency energy, is very important.
yes indeed, because the energy is transmitted in the electric field around the conductor. and that is why the type of dielectric is important.
Very low loss coax cables use as little amount of solid dielectric as possible. Many use a thin Teflon spiral which its main purpose is to
keep the centre conductor and the outer conductor from touching each other. Most of the dielectric is air.

Air-Dielectric-Coax-Cross-Section-e1463494709155.jpg


low_loss_coax.jpg
bachir1994 said:
Moreover, under your control, at ultra high frequency, several Ghz, the central conductor become unnecessary, it is called in this case the waveguide
Yup, so then you only have the outer shield which constrains the electric and magnetic fields

dJQW1.png

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • Air-Dielectric-Coax-Cross-Section-e1463494709155.jpg
    Air-Dielectric-Coax-Cross-Section-e1463494709155.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 669
  • low_loss_coax.jpg
    low_loss_coax.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 1,088
  • dJQW1.png
    dJQW1.png
    16.4 KB · Views: 628
bachir1994 said:
Hi,
Is it true that the transmission of energy is not inside an electrical conductor, but outside the metal. this even for frequencies around 50 hertz.
Thank's
This question appears to be very harmless and deserving a simple answer. But the fact is that, in there is the dreaded "what actually happens?" question - to which there is never an answer.
You can treat most circuit problems without needing to decide one way or another. You can usually treat wave / antenna / transmission line problems by assuming that the power is not transmitted through the metal bits. But the losses inside the conductors that 'guide' the power can become relevant and those losses can be described in terms of power actually flowing through the conductor / wire / waveguide walls.
The only explanation for the fact that medium and low frequency Radio Waves 'hug' the ground and don't go off into the sky is that the losses in the ground cause the waves to tilt downwards towards the ground. No resistance, no wave tilt and the ground signal dies out.

As with all of Science and Engineering, we describe things by using models that work. That's all. Nothing in Science is Really REAL.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
345
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K