Electrical Potential Homework: 3 Charges, 2 uC Each, 0.400m Sides

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three equal point charges, each with a charge of 2.00 µC, positioned at the corners of an equilateral triangle with sides measuring 0.400 m. The discussion centers around calculating the potential energy of this system, taking into account the potential energy when the charges are infinitely far apart.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of assembling the charges one by one and the work required to bring each charge from infinity. Questions arise regarding the potential energy associated with each charge and how it changes as more charges are added to the system.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts of electric potential and potential energy. Participants are questioning the assumptions about the work done to bring in each charge and how the potential energy of the system is affected by the presence of other charges. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations and the conceptual understanding of potential energy in relation to the arrangement of charges.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of electric potential and potential energy, with some confusion about the relationships between the charges and the work required to assemble them. The discussion reflects the challenges of understanding these concepts in the context of the problem.

  • #31
robb_ said:
The potential to consider for the third charge does work out to be twice that of the single charge in this case. That is because the charges have the same size and sign, and the first two charges are equidistant from the third charge. So please don't think that the new potential is always twice the first one.
In general, Vnew = \Sigma k Q_{i}/r_{i}. I know that may look confusing but it just says to add up the potential from each charge to find the total potential. The distances to each charge may be different, the size or sign may differ as well.

Okay the more I understand this, the more I get confused. The charge value of all 3 three charges are the SAME, the signs are all the same, the distance between all three charges are the SAME. I'm sorry maybe it's just not going into my head, but I'm still not getting what you're saying. You said the potential of charge 3 is just the summation of c1/c2, okay I get that. The potential for c2 is V= kQ/r, the only change is that we now have another charge being brought in, there is no sign differences, all the values are still the same. So I don't know what you're asking to sum up because if c1/c2 produce the same potential individually, then they should be 2*V when C3 comes in. From what you're saying that's incorrect, I wish there was a solid example in the book but there isn't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
No, the total potential for charge three is just twice that of the single charge alone in this problem. Sorry if it didnt come out like that.
 
  • #33
robb_ said:
No, the total potential for charge three is just twice that of the single charge alone in this problem. Sorry if it didnt come out like that.

So ... V= k(2Q)/r ??
 
  • #35
  • #36
Just to clarify

Total work for Charge 3 => U = Q*Vnew

Where Vnew = \frac {k(2Q)} {r}

U = Q * \frac {k(2Q)} {r}

I only ask because I'm low on tries since I've been working on this problem earlier.
 
  • #37
Yes, now add that energy to the energy to bring in the second and first charges. (first one is zero)
 
  • #38
robb_ said:
Yes, now add that energy to the energy to bring in the second and first charges. (first one is zero)

That's just U_{tot} for Charge 3 right?
 
  • #39
That will be the total energy associated with the charges-> the potential energy.
 
  • #40
robb_ said:
That will be the total energy associated with the charges-> the potential energy.

Okay, potential energy, for the entire system am I correct?
 
  • #41
yuppers if we are both talking tomatoes!:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K