Electrical Resonance and Complex Numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the resonance angular frequency \(\omega\) for a circuit with complex impedance \(Z\) involving resistance \(R\), inductance \(L\), and capacitance \(C\). The circuit configuration includes a resistor and inductor in series, with a capacitor in parallel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the condition for resonance, which requires the complex impedance \(Z\) to be real. There are attempts to express the real component of \(Z\) and questions about how to derive \(\omega\) from it. Some participants suggest using Euler's relation and setting the imaginary part of \(Z\) to zero as a potential approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to clarify the relationship between the components of \(Z\) and the resonance condition. Some participants have offered guidance on setting the imaginary part of \(Z\) to zero, leading to a quadratic equation for \(\omega\). There is an acknowledgment of the simplicity of this approach, though some participants express confusion about earlier steps.

Contextual Notes

There are references to different circuit setups and angles related to \(Z\), which may introduce additional complexity to the problem. Participants are navigating through these variations while seeking clarity on the original question.

thirdchildikari
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A circuit is said to be in resonance if it's complex impedance Z (in terms of R, L, and C (being the resistance, inductance, and capacitance)) is real. We are to determine the resonance angular frequency [tex]\omega[/tex] in terms of R, L, and C.

Homework Equations



The circuit is setup so that the resistor and inductor are in series, and the capacitor in parallel with them. I've solved for he total impedance as,

[tex]Z_{tot}=\frac{R-i(\omega c R^2 + \omega^3 L^2 C - \omega L)}{(\omega C R)^2+(\omega^2 L C - 1)^2}[/tex]

And this agrees with the answer supplied in the text. I feel that Euler's relation should be playing a role here as well.

The Attempt at a Solution



The question mentions that the circuit would be in resonance if Z is real. I'm thinking that must mean

[tex]Z_{real}=\frac{R}{(\omega C R)^2+(\omega^2 L C - 1)^2}[/tex]

But even if that's true, how would I then find [tex]\omega[/tex]? This real component of Z isn't equal to anything. Using Euler's relation seems promising, but for some reason I just don't know what steps to take here. Do I use Euler's relation and set it equal to the real component of Z?

Also, another question of mine (about a similar, yet different circuit setup) mentions the angle of Z being 45 degrees? That would mean real and imaginary components of Z are equal, but where does that get me? And do I need an angle for my original question.

This stuff is driving me nuts...any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thirdchildikari said:

Homework Statement



A circuit is said to be in resonance if it's complex impedance Z (in terms of R, L, and C (being the resistance, inductance, and capacitance)) is real. We are to determine the resonance angular frequency [tex]\omega[/tex] in terms of R, L, and C.

Homework Equations



The circuit is setup so that the resistor and inductor are in series, and the capacitor in parallel with them. I've solved for he total impedance as,

[tex]Z_{tot}=\frac{R-i(\omega c R^2 + \omega^3 L^2 C - \omega L)}{(\omega C R)^2+(\omega^2 L C - 1)^2}[/tex]

And this agrees with the answer supplied in the text. I feel that Euler's relation should be playing a role here as well.

The Attempt at a Solution



The question mentions that the circuit would be in resonance if Z is real. I'm thinking that must mean

[tex]Z_{real}=\frac{R}{(\omega C R)^2+(\omega^2 L C - 1)^2}[/tex]

But even if that's true, how would I then find [tex]\omega[/tex]? This real component of Z isn't equal to anything. Using Euler's relation seems promising, but for some reason I just don't know what steps to take here. Do I use Euler's relation and set it equal to the real component of Z?

Just set the imaginary part of Z equal to zero! In other words set
[tex]\omega c R^2 + \omega^3 L^2 C - \omega L=0[/tex]
You may divide by omega throughout (since we assume omega is not zero itself) and that leaves you with a quadratic formula for omega

Also, another question of mine (about a similar, yet different circuit setup) mentions the angle of Z being 45 degrees? That would mean real and imaginary components of Z are equal, but where does that get me? And do I need an angle for my original question.

This stuff is driving me nuts...any help would be appreciated.
It leaves you with an equation. Just set the imaginary part equal to the real part.

Hope this helps

Patrick
 
nrqed said:
Just set the imaginary part of Z equal to zero! In other words set
[tex]\omega c R^2 + \omega^3 L^2 C - \omega L=0[/tex]
You may divide by omega throughout (since we assume omega is not zero itself) and that leaves you with a quadratic formula for omega

...wow...why did I not see that hours ago?

Thanks a ton...I'm really sort of awestruck at how simple that was and how I didn't see it sooner.
 
thirdchildikari said:
...wow...why did I not see that hours ago?

Thanks a ton...I'm really sort of awestruck at how simple that was and how I didn't see it sooner.

:-) :-)

Sometimes we miss the obvious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K