Electricity, Electic Force, and Charge Transfer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two conducting spheres with charges of opposite signs and unequal magnitudes. Initially, they attract each other with a specified force, and after being connected by a wire, they repel each other with a different force. Participants are tasked with determining the magnitudes of the initial charges on the spheres.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore relationships between the initial and final forces and the charges, questioning how to isolate variables to solve for the unknown charges. There is discussion about using substitution methods and the implications of sign conventions in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various algebraic manipulations and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some guidance has been provided regarding substitution and the use of quadratic equations, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method to solve for the charges.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the different forces and the need to consider sign conventions carefully. There is an acknowledgment that the problem may require advanced algebraic techniques, such as completing the square, to arrive at a solution.

Kaoi
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Electricity, Electric Force, and Charge Transfer

Homework Statement



"Two conducting spheres have identical radii. Initially, they have charges of opposite sign and unequal magnitudes with the magnitude of the positive charge larger than the magnitude of the negative charge. They attract each other with a force of 0.224 N when separated by 0.4 m.

The spheres are suddenly connected with a thin wire, which is then removed. Now the spheres repel each other with a force of 0.039 N. What are the magnitudes of the initial positive and negative charges? Answer in units of C."

Given:
\bullet F_{e,i} = -0.224 N
\bullet r = 0.4 m
\bullet F_{e,f} = 0.039 N
\bullet k_{C} = 8.99 \times 10^9 \frac{N \cdot m^2}{C^2}

Unknown:
\bullet q_{pos} = ?
\bullet q_{neg} = ?

Homework Equations



F_{e} = \frac{k_{C}q_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



q_{pos} + q_{neg} = 2 q_{f}

F_{e,i} = \frac{k_{C}q_{pos}q_{neg}}{r^2}

F_{e,f} = \frac{k_{C}q_{f}^2}{r^2}

q_{f} = \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}} = \frac {q_{pos} + q_{neg}}{2}

q_{pos}+q_{neg} = 2r\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}

q_{pos} = 2r\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}}- q_{neg}

At this point, I wasn't sure how to go about finding either of these charges, because you need one to solve for the other. Is there some clever mathematical trick or physical concept I'm missing here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the original force equation (i.e. |F|=0.224) you can substitute for one value of the charge and obtain an equation with just a single unknown. Also this might need looking at:

q_{pos} + q_{neg} = 2 q_{f}
 
Kurdt said:
From the original force equation (i.e. |F|=0.224) you can substitute for one value of the charge and obtain an equation with just a single unknown.

If I solve that, I get:

F_{e,i} = \frac{k_{C}q_{pos}{q_{neg}}}{r^2}

q_{pos}q_{neg} = \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}

And I can't solve for q_{pos} and q_{neg} at the same time...
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "substitution" here...

Kurdt said:
Also this might need looking at:

q_{pos} + q_{neg} = 2 q_{f}
Wouldn't the negative charge cancel out part of the positive charge?

q_{pos} + q_{neg} = q_{pos,remaining}

And then, since all that's left is positive charge, wouldn't the protons repel each other and spread evenly through the two connected spheres?

q_{f} = \frac{1}{2}q_{pos, remaining}

So:

2q_{f} = q_{pos,remaining} = q_{pos} + q_{neg}

At least, that's how I see it.
 
Last edited:
Kaoi said:
If I solve that, I get:

F_{e,i} = \frac{k_{C}q_{pos}{q_{neg}}}{r^2}

q_{pos}q_{neg} = \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}

And I can't solve for q_{pos} and q_{neg} at the same time...
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "substitution" here...

Try

q_{pos} = \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}q_{neg}}

Then substitute into:

q_{pos} = 2r\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}}- q_{neg}

and see how you go from there.
 
Last edited:
\frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}q_{neg}} = 2r\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}} - q_{neg}

q_{neg}+\frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}q_{neg}} = 2r\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}}

q_{neg}^2 + \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 2rq_{neg}\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}}

q_{neg}^2 - 2rq_{neg}\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}} + \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

So do I just solve that with the quadratic equation? (Sounds troublesome.)
 
I don't like this:

q_{pos} + q_{neg} = 2 q_{f}

You must remember sign conventions. If you fiddle with the signs you get a quadratic where you can complete the square.
 
Kurdt said:
I don't like this:

q_{pos} + q_{neg} = 2 q_{f}

You must remember sign conventions. If you fiddle with the signs you get a quadratic where you can complete the square.

But if the second charge is negative, wouldn't subtracting it make it addition?
 
Last edited:
All I was saying is you are adding a negative charge thus,

q_p+(-q_n) = q_p - q_n

Then your final equation will be solvable by the method of completing the square.
 
Changing the signs, I get basically the same equation with a couple of signs reversed-- that still doesn't help me much...

q_{neg}^2 + 2rq_{neg}\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}} - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

That's a strange square to complete...
 
  • #10
Have you ever heard of the completing the square method?

(x+a)^2 = x^2+2ax+a^2
x^2+2ax= (x+a)^2-a^2

Does the equation you have look familiar?
 
  • #11
So:

q_{neg}^2 + 2rq_{neg}\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}} - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

q_{neg}^2 + 2r\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}}{k_{C}}}q_{neg} = \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}

x=q_{neg}, I know that, which would make:

q_{neg}^2 + 2q_{f}q_{neg} = (q_{neg} + q_{f})^2 - q_{f}^2

and that almost works, but F_{e,i} and F_{e,f} are two different quantities, so I can't use \sqrt{\frac{F_{e}r^2}{k_{C}}} = q_{f} = a, right? It looks like that's the only thing getting in the way. (This got a lot more complicated than I thought it would be...)
 
Last edited:
  • #12
You can use \sqrt{\frac{F_{e}r^2}{k_{C}}} as a. Just apply the above relation that I gave. The other term in the equation just tags on the end unchanged.
 
  • #13
But the problem lies in which F_{e} to use, since there are different F_{e}s on the sides of the equation, and they're not equal.
 
  • #14
If we say \sqrt{\frac{F_{e}r^2}{k_{C}}}= k

Then,

q_{neg}^2 + 2q_{neg}k - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

(q_{neg}+k)^2 -k^2 - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

\left(q_{neg}+\sqrt{\frac{F_{e}r^2}{k_{C}}}\right)^2 - \frac{F_{e}r^2}{k_{C}} - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0
 
  • #15
That clears it up a lot for me. Sorry for making you have to go to so much trouble. o:)

So:

\left(q_{neg}+\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}}\right) ^2 - \frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}} - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

q_{neg} + \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}} = \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}} + \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}}

q_{neg} = \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2 + F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}} - \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}}

And then it's just simple addition.

Physics is hard. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Kaoi said:
That clears it up a lot for me. Sorry for making you have to go to so much trouble. o:)

So:

\left(q_{neg}+\sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}}\right) ^2 - \frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}} - \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}} = 0

q_{neg} + \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}} = \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}} + \frac{F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}}

q_{neg} = \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2 + F_{e,i}r^2}{k_{C}}} - \sqrt{\frac{F_{e,f}r^2}{k_{C}}}

And then it's just simple addition.

Physics is hard. :smile:

At least getting the other charge is not as hard. Physics ain't so bad just need to practise those basics such as quadratic equations and basic calculus etc. Looks like your algebra and manipulation is top notch though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
859
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K