Electromagnetic field emitted by a charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electromagnetic field generated by a single charge in motion, specifically how to express this field at a given point and time. The original poster seeks a precise relativistic formulation and has struggled to find satisfactory answers in various physics texts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for a precise formulation of the electromagnetic field and reference specific texts that may provide insights. There are mentions of relativistic effects and the use of retarded potentials. Some participants express concerns about the complexity of certain references and the clarity of explanations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided references to textbooks and online resources that may contain relevant information. There is an acknowledgment of the challenges in understanding the material, particularly regarding derivations and the use of retarded time. No consensus has been reached on a definitive answer, but various resources are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the difficulty in finding clear derivations and the potential for confusion in existing literature. There is also mention of the limitations of certain resources, such as the Wikipedia page, which some find misleading.

coquelicot
Messages
304
Reaction score
70
Hello,

What is the precise form of the electromagnetic field generated by a single charge q at a given point P and time t1, if the movement of q is described by M(t). I have seek the precise answer to this question in many books of physic, without success. I think it must be relativistic. Please, does someone have information in this subject?

thanks,
Mike.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coquelicot said:
Hello,

What is the precise form of the electromagnetic field generated by a single charge q at a given point P and time t1, if the movement of q is described by M(t). I have seek the precise answer to this question in many books of physic, without success. I think it must be relativistic. Please, does someone have information in this subject?

thanks,
Mike.
The precise answer is relativistic. It is usually formulated in terms of the retarded electric and magnetic potentials associated with charge and current densities.

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node20.html
 
coquelicot said:
I have seek the precise answer to this question in many books of physic, without success.

See Griffiths, "Introduction to Electrodynamics" (2nd edition), section 9.2.2 (pp. 421-426).

Or Jackson, "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition), section 14.1 (pp. 654-658).
 
jtbell said:
See Griffiths, "Introduction to Electrodynamics" (2nd edition), section 9.2.2 (pp. 421-426).

Or Jackson, "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition), section 14.1 (pp. 654-658).
Jackson is extremely difficult to read, even by those who have an excellant grasp on math and EM. In my humble opinion its best to go with Griffith.

Best wishes

Pete
 
Griffiths gives the correct answer in Eq. (9.107), but leaves out about two pages of derivation in getting to it. That's why he is simpler.
If you want a derivation (but, it's complicated), you can find one in Franklin, "Classical Electromagnetism", Sec. 15.4.2. The result is still difficult to use because it is in terms of the retarded time, which leads to all kinds of problems. For a particle moving with constant velocity, the fields can be given in terms of the instantaneous time by
[tex]{\bf E}= \frac{q{\bf r}}<br /> {\gamma^2[{\bf r}^2-({\bf v\times r})^2]^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex],
and B=vXE.
 
You might also try : http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~rfield/PHY2061/images/relativity_14.pdf

Replace the "14" in the above link with different numbers, you'll get more slides showing the derivation.

You might also try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism, though it's lacking diagrams at the moment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
You might also try : http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~rfield/PHY2061/images/relativity_14.pdf

Replace the "14" in the above link with different numbers, you'll get more slides showing the derivation.

You might also try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism, though it's lacking diagrams at the moment.
The Field pdf gives only the constant velocity field, which is the easy part.
The Wikipedia page is confusing, and gives the wrong answer for the E field of a moving charge. I would try to correct the Wikipedia page, but I don't want to abet a crime.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
486
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K