Electromagnetic induction (Faraday's law)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, particularly in the context of a semi-circular loop exposed to a magnetic field. Participants explore the implications of using an open loop versus a closed loop in calculating induced electromotive force (emf) and the conditions under which certain formulas are applicable.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of using a semi-circular loop in the context of Faraday's law, questioning whether the open nature of the loop affects the results. Some suggest considering the loop as closed by including the diameter, while others propose viewing the problem through the lens of motional emf. There are inquiries about the conditions under which certain expressions are applicable and the assumptions made regarding magnetic flux.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants presenting differing interpretations of how to apply Faraday's law. Some have offered guidance on considering the closed loop and the implications of the semicircle's orientation, while others express uncertainty about the proposed methods. Multiple perspectives are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the requirement for a closed loop in Faraday's law and the nature of the magnetic field involved. There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions related to the configuration of the loop and the resulting calculations of emf.

Meow12
Messages
46
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
A wire is bent to contain a semi-circular curve of radius 0.25m. It is rotated at 120rev/min as shown into a uniform magnetic field below the wire of 1.30T. What is the maximum emf induced between the left and right sides of the wire in V?
Relevant Equations
##\phi=\omega t##
##\Phi_B=BA\cos\phi##
##\displaystyle\epsilon=\oint\vec E\cdot d\vec{l}=-\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}##
physics.png

I used the formulas above and got the right answer:

##\phi=4\pi t##
##\Phi_B=0.128\cos 4\pi t##
##\epsilon=1.61\sin 4\pi t##
##\epsilon_\text{max}=1.61\ V##

But I still have a question: Faraday's law requires a closed loop, whereas the semi-circular loop I used was open on one side.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Underlying phenomenon for Faraday's law is the Lorentz force. The steps from there to Faraday's law and to your exercise answer are the same.

##\ ##
 
Where did you get the expression that you used? Under what conditions is it applicable? Just because it gives the "right answer" does not justify its use. For example, when the semicircle is in the orientation shown in the figure, the flux through the semicircle is zero. furthermore, it is zero not instantaneously as your expression predicts, but half the time needed for a complete revolution while the semicircle is outside the field.

If you want to apply Faraday's law, do it right. Consider a closed loop as shown below and use the definition of magnetic flux, $$\displaystyle\epsilon=\oint\vec E\cdot d\vec{l}
=-\frac{d}{dt}\left(\mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{\hat n}~da\right).$$ Since the magnetic field is constant and uniform, the only time dependence is in the normal to the loop ##\mathbf{\hat n}## so you have to find an expression for ##\dfrac{d \mathbf{\hat n}}{dt}## and take the dot product.

Alternatively, you can consider this to be a motional emf problem and find the potential difference between the two ends of the semicircle.
Loop_in_Field.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Meow12
I am not quite sure about @kuruman suggestion of the closed loop. I would choose as closed loop the semicircle together with the diameter. Then as @kuruman suggest i would view it as a motional EMF problem and compute the motional EMF as the line integral $$EMF=\int_C (\vec{B}\times\vec{v})\cdot \vec{dl}$$ where the curve of integration ##C## is the aforementioned closed loop. It is easy to see that ##\vec{B}\times\vec{v}=0## for the points of the closed loop that lie on the diameter because ##v=0## there.

You might tell me that there is no conducting path in the diameter but even if there was, the EMF would be the same for the whole closed loop, the only difference in physics is that we would have current circulating in that hypothetical closed loop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Meow12
Delta2 said:
I am not quite sure about @kuruman suggestion of the closed loop. I would choose as closed loop the semicircle together with the diameter.
We are saying the same thing. If you consider the formal integral over the entire circle, only the semicircle that has field lines going through it contributes non-zero terms while the other half contributes a bunch of zeroes. So one gets the same answer as using the semicircle that you suggest.
 
kuruman said:
We are saying the same thing. If you consider the formal integral over the entire circle, only the semicircle that has field lines going through it contributes non-zero terms while the other half contributes a bunch of zeroes. So one gets the same answer as using the semicircle that you suggest.
Ehm this isnt so clear to me, with your choice of closed loop, the way i see it, we have EMF during the whole rotation time (full cycle) (during half cycle the one half semicircle contributes non zero, during the next half cycle the other half semicircle contributes non zero), while with my choice we have EMF only during half cycle.
 
You are right. I don't know what I was thinking.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Actually, there is no reason to consider a closed loop enclosing an area for a formal application of Faraday's law or using motional emf. We are looking for the maximum emf. Since ##\text{emf}=-\dfrac{d\Phi_M}{dt},## all one has to do is find an expression for ##\Phi_M(t)## and maximize its time derivative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K