Electromagnetism: Direction of B-field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a particle moving through a current loop and the associated magnetic field (B-field) it experiences. The context is electromagnetism, specifically focusing on the direction and implications of the magnetic field generated by a current-carrying loop.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the direction of the magnetic field and the motion of the particle. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of "negative B-field" and its implications in specific contexts, such as the Zeeman effect.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications of magnetic field direction. Some participants clarify that "negative B-field" is not a standard term, while others question how changes in the magnetic field direction affect atomic states and alignments. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of magnetic field directionality and its effects on atomic states, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of their reasoning. The discussion includes references to specific phenomena like the Zeeman shift, indicating a focus on quantum effects in magnetic fields.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I have a current loop (see attached), and I have found the expression for the B-field along the axis of the loop. A particle moves through the loop, as also shown in the attached picture. Using the right hand, I let current run through the loop counter-clockwise, shown as well. My question is, what is the sign of the B-field that the particle experiences?

My own attempt is the following: So I know that the particle moves in the positive z-direction. Since the magnetic field Bz points towards -z, then the particle experiences a negative magnetic field.

Is my resoning correct?Niles.
 

Attachments

  • setup.PNG
    setup.PNG
    696 bytes · Views: 467
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, If the particle travels along the axis of the ring and the current is counter-clockwise from the point of view of the particle, the direction of magnetic field is opposite to the direction of its velocity, points into the -z direction. The "negative magnetic field" is not a correct expression, as B is a 3D vector. If the particle does not travel along the z axis, the field it experiences is not parallel with z.

ehild
 
Thanks. But if I only confine my analysis to the axial direction (i.e. only z), then the particle must experience a negative B-field with the current setup?
 
There is no such thing as "negative B field". If the z axis points on the right, the z component of B is negative.

ehild
 
Thanks, I understand.Niles.
 
I'm actually not 100% sure I understand this after all. If the z-component of B points towards -z, will the magnetic field experienced by the atom be negative? By "negative magnetic field" I am referring to (for example) that the Zeeman shift [itex]\propto m B[/itex] for a magnetic substate m>0 will be negative.
 
When the Zeeman shift is derived the coordinate system is set up with z axis pointing in the direction of the magnetic field. The magnetic dipoles align with respect to the magnetic field. So "B" is positive in your formula.

ehild
 
ehild said:
When the Zeeman shift is derived the coordinate system is set up with z axis pointing in the direction of the magnetic field. The magnetic dipoles align with respect to the magnetic field. So "B" is positive in your formula.

ehild

Thanks for helping. There is something bothering me though: Say I have an atom in a state with zero magnetic quantum number mF=0. Now I apply a magnetic field to it such that it is pointing towards +z. Now I turn on my laser with -hbar polarization, and make it point along +z, i.e. the atom is promoted to a state with mF'=-1. In other words, the projection of F onto B yields -1*B. So far so good.

Now say that the direction of the magnetic field changes instantly fast by e.g. 120 degrees with respect to z. The atom will still be in the very same state, since it has no reason to change (i.e., no energy has been applied to it). However the spatial orientation must change.

Will the atom re-align itself such that the new projection of its magnetic moment onto (the new) B is -1*B?

Best wishes,
Niles.
 
I am not an expert on magnetic phenomena, so I might be wrong.
The magnetic momentum can be both positive and negative and also zero. It means how the atomic magnet is aligned with respect to the field. The energy of the atom depends on the alignment - can be higher or lower than the energy without the magnetic field. The atom can be excited to a higher energy state which means an other alignment.

If you change the direction of the magnetic field, the energy of the atomic magnets will change.

ehild
 
  • #10
Thanks for that. I'll try and ask in the Quantum Physics subforum as well, but thanks for taking time to think/write about it.Niles.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
965
Replies
10
Views
2K