[Electromagnetism] Force on a moving charge expression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expression for the total force on a moving charge in the context of electromagnetism, specifically focusing on the relationship between electric and magnetic fields and their potentials. Participants are tasked with showing how the force can be expressed using scalar and vector potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the force expression, questioning the relationship between different types of derivatives of the vector potential. There is an attempt to apply known equations and identities to relate the force to the potentials.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the derivatives involved and how they relate to the expressions for electric and magnetic fields. There is ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships, but no consensus has been reached on the final form of the expression.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the distinction between partial and convective derivatives, indicating a need to clarify these concepts in the context of the problem. The discussion reflects an examination of assumptions related to the definitions of the terms involved.

carlosbgois
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
The total force on a moving charge q with velocity v is given by \mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}) Using the scalar and vector potentials, show that \mathbf{F}=q[-\nabla\phi-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}+\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})]

Homework Equations


[/B]
(1) \mathbf{E}=-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}-\nabla\phi
(2) \mathbf{B}=\nabla\times\mathbf{A}
(3) \mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})=\nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)

The Attempt at a Solution



\mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B})=q[-\nabla\phi-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}]

Now I need to show that

\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}=\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})

I tried applying (3) but didn't know where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carlosbgois said:

Homework Equations


[/B]
(1) \mathbf{E}=-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}-\nabla\phi
Here, the time derivative should be a partial derivative ##\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}## ; i.e., it denotes the rate of change of ##\mathbf{A}## at a fixed point of space. But in the final expression that you want to get to for the force, the derivative is the "convective" time derivative ##\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}## ; i.e., it denotes the rate of change of ##\mathbf{A}## as you move along with the particle. You will need to relate the two types of derivatives. See http://www.continuummechanics.org/cm/materialderivative.html

(3) \mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})=\nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)
The last term is not quite written correctly. In your way of writing it, the Del operator has nothing to act upon.
 
Last edited:
As TSny said \mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} nowusing the triple product identity:
\mathbf{v}\times(\nabla \times \mathbf{A}) = \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}) - \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla)
Which in the Lorentz equation:
\mathbf{F} = q \left[-\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} + \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}) - \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) \right]
or
\mathbf{F} = q \left[-\nabla \phi - [\partial_t + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) ] \mathbf{A} + \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v})\right]
where the term in the square bracket acting on \mathbf{A} is called the convective derivative, viz. (\partial_t + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) ) \mathbf{A} = \frac{d \mathbf{A}}{dt} as required.
 
Got it! Thank you all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K