[Electromagnetism] Force on a moving charge expression

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total force on a moving charge \( q \) with velocity \( \mathbf{v} \) is expressed as \( \mathbf{F} = q(\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}) \). Utilizing the scalar potential \( \phi \) and vector potential \( \mathbf{A} \), the force can be rewritten as \( \mathbf{F} = q[-\nabla\phi - \frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt} + \nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})] \). The relationship between the electric field \( \mathbf{E} \) and the vector potential is defined by \( \mathbf{E} = -\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt} - \nabla\phi \). The convective derivative is crucial for relating the time derivative of \( \mathbf{A} \) to the force expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the gradient and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory, particularly the Lorentz force law.
  • Knowledge of scalar and vector potentials in electromagnetism.
  • Concept of convective derivatives and their application in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz force law in detail.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of scalar and vector potentials in electromagnetism.
  • Explore the concept of convective derivatives and their significance in fluid dynamics.
  • Investigate the relationship between electric and magnetic fields through Maxwell's equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of force expressions on moving charges.

carlosbgois
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
The total force on a moving charge q with velocity v is given by \mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}) Using the scalar and vector potentials, show that \mathbf{F}=q[-\nabla\phi-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}+\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})]

Homework Equations


[/B]
(1) \mathbf{E}=-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}-\nabla\phi
(2) \mathbf{B}=\nabla\times\mathbf{A}
(3) \mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})=\nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)

The Attempt at a Solution



\mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B})=q[-\nabla\phi-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}]

Now I need to show that

\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}=\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})

I tried applying (3) but didn't know where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carlosbgois said:

Homework Equations


[/B]
(1) \mathbf{E}=-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}-\nabla\phi
Here, the time derivative should be a partial derivative ##\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}## ; i.e., it denotes the rate of change of ##\mathbf{A}## at a fixed point of space. But in the final expression that you want to get to for the force, the derivative is the "convective" time derivative ##\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}## ; i.e., it denotes the rate of change of ##\mathbf{A}## as you move along with the particle. You will need to relate the two types of derivatives. See http://www.continuummechanics.org/cm/materialderivative.html

(3) \mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})=\nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)
The last term is not quite written correctly. In your way of writing it, the Del operator has nothing to act upon.
 
Last edited:
As TSny said \mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} nowusing the triple product identity:
\mathbf{v}\times(\nabla \times \mathbf{A}) = \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}) - \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla)
Which in the Lorentz equation:
\mathbf{F} = q \left[-\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} + \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}) - \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) \right]
or
\mathbf{F} = q \left[-\nabla \phi - [\partial_t + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) ] \mathbf{A} + \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v})\right]
where the term in the square bracket acting on \mathbf{A} is called the convective derivative, viz. (\partial_t + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) ) \mathbf{A} = \frac{d \mathbf{A}}{dt} as required.
 
Got it! Thank you all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K