Electron oscillation frequency, what pushes them away?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the oscillation frequency of electrons and the forces acting on them within an atom. It clarifies that while Coulomb's law describes the attractive force between electrons and nuclei, the concept of what "pushes" electrons away is more complex. The effective potential created by centrifugal force and Coulomb attraction leads to oscillatory behavior, resembling a harmonic oscillator for low amplitudes. Additionally, the phenomenon of Rayleigh scattering illustrates how incoming electromagnetic waves cause electrons to oscillate, re-radiating energy in a polarized manner.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and its implications in atomic physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of effective potential in quantum mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic wave interactions with matter
  • Awareness of quantum phenomena such as Zitterbewegung
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Rayleigh scattering" and its effects on light polarization
  • Study "Zitterbewegung" and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore "harmonic oscillators" in the context of atomic models
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic waves in electron excitation and emission
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the behavior of electrons in atomic structures and their interaction with electromagnetic radiation.

Thierry12
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Electron oscillate at their natural frequency. I know the force that brings them back is a force of attractrion (Coulomb law) but what pushes them away?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thierry12 said:
Electron oscillate at their natural frequency. I know the force that brings them back is a force of attractrion (Coulomb law) but what pushes them away?

Er.. what is an electron's "natural frequency"?

Zz.
 
I guess you mean within an atom... then, it's a rather tricky question! Two possible answers:

(1) Short story: "centrifugal force". Along with Coulomb attraction create an "effective potential" for the radial variable which has a minimum and, around it, a well which looks like a harmonic oscillator well for low amplitudes.

(2) You mean the frequency of rotation around the nucleus. Then, nothing to do with harmonic oscillators.
 
jrlaguna said:
I guess you mean within an atom... then, it's a rather tricky question! Two possible answers:

(1) Short story: "centrifugal force". Along with Coulomb attraction create an "effective potential" for the radial variable which has a minimum and, around it, a well which looks like a harmonic oscillator well for low amplitudes.

(2) You mean the frequency of rotation around the nucleus. Then, nothing to do with harmonic oscillators.

I have always found that it is almost "futile" to guess at a question that has been posed in such a vague manner. Even if one were to assume that this particular question meant either an electron in an atom, or the deBroglie wave, it still doesn't define a "natural frequency" because in both cases, there can be more than just ONE "frequency" involved.

It is best that one waits till the OP comes back and put SOME effort into explaining the question.

Zz.
 
Sorry for the lack of precisions, let me try again: correct me if I am wrong but i picture the oscillation of the eletron as an harmonic oscillation, and i was wondering what would the force constant be/represent? (If I am completely wrong please tell me, I am not very advanced in physics).

ty
 
What do you mean by the oscillation of the electron?
 
Sorry to tell you, but you are completely wrong.
 
Could you tell me how it works generaly the electron oscillation ( no need to be precise but just the general idea )

ty
 
If we examine the theory of Rayleigh scattering in air, the conventional theory has the electrons in atoms being displaced from the nuclei center by the E field vector of the incoming visible light photons, and pulled back by the nuclear charge center (hence dipole oscillation). The oscillation is in phase with, and at the frequency of, the incoming radiation, hence the driving force frequency. The atoms re-radiate in the plane perpendicular to the E vector, which is why Rayleigh scattering (blue sky light) at 90 degrees is polarized.
 
  • #10
Is your question "how does the electron move within an atom"?

Many times, the problem is that the question one is asking is the thing that is wrong. Are you thinking that the electron in an atom is oscillating radially back and forward? Where did you get the idea that "Electron oscillate at their natural frequency"? You have to be more explicit when you ask things if you are a beginner.
 
  • #11
Bob S said:
If we examine the theory of Rayleigh scattering in air, the conventional theory has the electrons in atoms being displaced from the nuclei center by the E field vector of the incoming visible light photons, and pulled back by the nuclear charge center (hence dipole oscillation). The oscillation is in phase with, and at the frequency of, the incoming radiation, hence the driving force frequency. The atoms re-radiate in the plane perpendicular to the E vector, which is why Rayleigh scattering (blue sky light) at 90 degrees is polarized.


That is the explanation given in Classical Electrodynamics, this is the Quantum Physics forum;-)
 
  • #12
Im trying to understand how an electromagnetic wave makes charges oscillate which makes em radiation similar to the original wave. I was trying to find out about oscillation at its base to understand how it really happens.
 
  • #13
Ty for the help btw, really appreciate it!
 
  • #14
Thierry12 said:
Im trying to understand how an electromagnetic wave makes charges oscillate which makes em radiation similar to the original wave. I was trying to find out about oscillation at its base to understand how it really happens.

You really need to sit down and think through your question, because if you look at the very beginning of this thread, you mentioned no such thing, but you somehow expected us to be able to read your mind and figure out what you meant. It took SEVERAL posts to actually extract something resembling a clarification of what you actually are looking for. Oy vey!

Zz.
 
  • #15
Sorry about that, i will try to be more precise next time
 
  • #16
Thierry12 said:
Im trying to understand how an electromagnetic wave makes charges oscillate which makes em radiation similar to the original wave. I was trying to find out about oscillation at its base to understand how it really happens.
when the electrons are bound to the nucleus the light produced is exactly the same as when they are free (as in a conductor) only the amount of light produced is different. instead of total reflection from the surface (like a mirror) you only get partial reflection (like from the surface of water).
 
  • #17
in this way of looking at things we imagine that the electron is bound to the nucleus by some kind of spring or something. this might explain the reflection of light from a surface and this would indeed result in a 'natural frequency'.

however this idea has absolutely nothing to do with light emitted when the electron transitions from one energy level to another (even though you can associate a certain frequency with each orbital. the frequency of emitted light being equal to the differece of the frequencies of the orbitals that the electron transitions between)
 
  • #18
Thierry12 said:
Electron oscillate at their natural frequency. I know the force that brings them back is a force of attractrion (Coulomb law) but what pushes them away?
the answer is 'nothing'. the electron cloud sits directly over the nucleus.
 
  • #19
When asking about the natural oscillation of electrons, it is possible that Thierry12 had heard of “Zitterbewegung”.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zitterbewegung for a great explanation of the “trembling motion” of electrons discovered by Schroedinger and Dirac.

For more advanced reading, see: arXiv:0810.2186v1 “Catching the Zitterbewegung”

Of course this is not for Classical Physics, it belongs in the Quantum Physics threads.

Bobbywhy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K