Electron spin, why do the pairs have to be opposite?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electron spin, particularly in the context of entangled electrons and the implications of their spins being opposite. Participants explore the nature of spin in quantum mechanics, conservation laws, and the experimental setups that lead to these observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes an experiment involving two electrons where the spins are opposite (one up, one down) and questions how this determination is made prior to observation.
  • Another participant argues that electrons do not necessarily need to have opposite spins and discusses the concept of entanglement, suggesting that the conservation of spin must be obeyed.
  • A participant explains that the experimental setup is designed to ensure that the total angular momentum is zero, which implies that the spins must balance each other out.
  • Another participant points out that while the total angular momentum must be zero, this does not necessarily mean that the total spin of the two-electron system is zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether electrons must have opposite spins in all scenarios. Some assert that the experimental conditions dictate the spins, while others challenge this notion, indicating that there are cases where spins can be the same.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of spin and entanglement, as well as the implications of conservation laws, which may not be fully resolved within the conversation.

Sephiroth2088
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the experiment where there are two electrons, and one is shot out to a person, the experiment depends on the two having opposite spins, one up one down, though which has which is not determined until observation.

So person 1 looks at theirs and sees it's an upward spin. This collapses person 2s to downward imediantly. So even if the other person was 2 billion lightyears away at that time, it would still effect instantly. This experiment makes sense, aside from one thing.

How do they know that one is up spin, and one is down spin to begin with?

I think I may have learned in chemistry that on the same valance level, electrons must have opposite spins or something, is that it or am I completely off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sephiroth2088 said:
In the experiment where there are two electrons, and one is shot out to a person, the experiment depends on the two having opposite spins, one up one down, though which has which is not determined until observation.

So person 1 looks at theirs and sees it's an upward spin. This collapses person 2s to downward imediantly. So even if the other person was 2 billion lightyears away at that time, it would still effect instantly. This experiment makes sense, aside from one thing.

How do they know that one is up spin, and one is down spin to begin with?

I think I may have learned in chemistry that on the same valance level, electrons must have opposite spins or something, is that it or am I completely off?

No they do not need, in general, to have opposite spins.

You are describing an entanglement experiment. Although there seems to
be an element of randomness in the "collapse of the wavefunction", it is
not that random. The conservation laws must be all obeyed and in this
case it's the conservation of spin.

Another experiment would be where both particles have the same spin, but
of unknown direction. So if one is up the other must be up as well, and visa
versa, if one is down the other must be down as well.


Regards, Hans
 
Sephiroth2088 said:
How do they know that one is up spin, and one is down spin to begin with?

Because the experimental setup is constructed specifically so that the initial state that produces the two electrons (or whatever kind of particle is being used) has a total angular momentum of zero. Therefore, by conservation of total angular momentum, the sum of the particles' angular momenta must also be zero.
 
jtbell said:
Therefore, by conservation of total angular momentum, the sum of the particles' angular momenta must also be zero.
But still, just to be picky, this does not necessarily imply that the total spin of the two electron system is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K