Electronics true or false questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electronics
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around confirming the correctness of answers to true or false questions related to electronics. The first question about ripple being an alternative component of DC is confirmed as true, while the second question regarding saturation current being greater than conductance current is clarified as false, with saturation current being zero. The amplification formula for a non-inverting op-amp is confirmed as true, although a minor detail about R1 and R2 is noted. Lastly, the duty cycle of a signal is corrected from 40% to 60%, emphasizing the importance of measuring current presence. Overall, the participants engage in clarifying concepts and correcting misunderstandings in electronics.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Can you help confirm whether my answers are correct or not?------------------------------

True or False (+answer must be explained)

Question #1:

Ripple is an alternative component of the DC component of an electrical signal

Answer #1: True. A period, accoriding to wiki, is "small unwanted residual periodic variation of the direct current (dc) output of a power supply which has been derived from an alternating current (ac) source."

Question #2:

The saturation current in a transistor is greater than the conductance current

Answer #2: Not true.

Saturation current = 0
So it can't be greater than the conductance current!
The conductance current is greater than the saturation current.

Question #3: The following amplification of the op-amp is

Af = 1 + R1/R2

http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/3954/noninvert.jpg
Answer #3: True.

Since what we have here is a non-inverting op-amp, that's its formula.

Question #4: The duty cycle of the repeating signal is 40%
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/3328/dutyc.jpg
Answer #4: Not true. Duty cycle is measured when there is current, not when there isn't. Therefor, in this case, it's 60%.

6/10 x 100 = 60%
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Femme_physics said:
Can you help confirm whether my answers are correct or not?

I'll give it a try! :smile:
Hope it helps.


Femme_physics said:
Question #1:

Ripple is an alternative component of the DC component of an electrical signal

Answer #1: True. A period, accoriding to wiki, is "small unwanted residual periodic variation of the direct current (dc) output of a power supply which has been derived from an alternating current (ac) source."

Good!


Femme_physics said:

Question #2:

The saturation current in a transistor is greater than the conductance current

Answer #2: Not true.

Saturation current = 0
So it can't be greater than the conductance current!
The conductance current is greater than the saturation current.

I do not know what you mean by "conduction current"... :confused:
There's a couple of possibilities.

But saturation current is when the transistor is saturated with so much base current that it can't open any wider.
This is the highest current you can get...


Femme_physics said:

Question #3: The following amplification of the op-amp is

Af = 1 + R1/R2

http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/3954/noninvert.jpg



Answer #3: True.

Since what we have here is a non-inverting op-amp, that's its formula.

It is *almost* the formula...
Can you spot the difference?



Femme_physics said:
Question #4: The duty cycle of the repeating signal is 40%
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/3328/dutyc.jpg



Answer #4: Not true. Duty cycle is measured when there is current, not when there isn't. Therefor, in this case, it's 60%.

6/10 x 100 = 60%

Yep! :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll give it a try!
Hope it helps.

You, always.

But saturation current is when the transistor is saturated with so much base current that it can't open any wider.
This is the highest current you can get...

Oh, so my bad. Yes, I forgot...it's kinda in the word, "saturated". *smacks forehead*

So, saturated must always be the highest current, therefor it must be higher than the "conductance current" (It's just the direct translation from hebrew)EDIT: The translation may be "threshold current", am not sure.

It is *almost* the formula...
Can you spot the difference?

Yes, R1 an R2 are opposite in this case. Got it. Thanks! :smile:
Glad I got the other 2 right!
 
Last edited:
So it's all good now! ;)

Femme_physics said:
EDIT: The translation may be "threshold current", am not sure.

Threshold current sounds a bit like cutoff current.
Remember that that was the opposite from saturation?

From wikipedia:
wikipedia said:
Cutoff: In cutoff, biasing conditions opposite of saturation are present. There is very little current, which corresponds to a logical "off", or an open switch.
 
Thanks, ILS. my savior.. :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K