Electron's Energy After Absorbing A Photon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kennedy111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Photon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An electron in the 3rd stationary state of a hydrogen atom, initially at -1.512 eV, absorbs a photon with a wavelength of 1090 nm. The energy of the photon is calculated using the formula Ephoton = hc/λ, resulting in approximately 1.1405 eV. The final energy of the electron after absorption is calculated as -0.3715 eV. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using accurate constants for Planck's constant and the speed of light when performing calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles related to electron energy levels
  • Familiarity with the energy of photons and the equation Ephoton = hc/λ
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Basic concepts of hydrogen atom structure and stationary states
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the calculation of photon energy using different wavelengths
  • Learn about the significance of significant figures in physics calculations
  • Explore the energy levels of hydrogen and other elements
  • Investigate the implications of electron transitions and photon absorption in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying quantum mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in the behavior of electrons in atomic structures.

Kennedy111
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron in the 3rd stationary state around a hydrogen atom has an energy value of -1.512 eV. What will the electron's energy be if the hydrogen atom absorbs a photon with a wavelength of 1090 nm?

E = -1.512 eV


Homework Equations


Ephoton = hc/λ


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm unsure if my formula was the correct one to use...

E photon = hc/λ
= (6.63 x 10^-34 J*s)(3.00 x 10^8 m/s) / (1090 x 10^-9 m)
= 1.82477064 x 10^-19 J
= 1.140481651 eV

ΔE = Ef - Ei
Ef = ΔE + Ei
= (1.140481651 eV) + (-1.512 eV)
= -0.371518349 eV

The electron's energy will be about -0.3715 eV

I am really just unsure of my process and therefore my answer, so I would just like a second opinion. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct, but you gave the result with four significant digits while calculating with values of h and c accurate to three digits. As the initial energy and wavelength were given with four significant digits, use more accurate values for c and h.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K