Electrostatic force electroscope

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the total charge (Q) applied to a large electroscope with 78-cm-long wires and 24-g spheres at their ends. The user initially attempted to find Q using the force equation F=ma and Coulomb's law but encountered confusion regarding the forces acting on the spheres. Key insights include the need to consider three forces acting on each sphere and the importance of setting up a free body diagram to apply static equilibrium conditions correctly. The final charge calculated was Q=1.59e-7 C, but further clarification on the forces involved was required.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and electrostatic forces
  • Knowledge of static equilibrium and free body diagrams
  • Basic trigonometry for calculating angles and lengths
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law (F=ma)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in electrostatics
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams
  • Review Coulomb's law and its application in electrostatic problems
  • Explore trigonometric functions in physics for solving triangle-related problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatic forces and the principles of static equilibrium in electroscopes.

joanne
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
electroscope

A large electroscope is made with “leaves” that are 78-cm-long wires with tiny 24-g spheres at the ends. When charged, nearly all the charge resides on the spheres. If the wires each make a 3.0E1° angle with the vertical (see figure), what total charge Q must have been applied to the electroscope? Ignore the mass of the wires.

*here is what I did...and got stuck in the middle of doing this problem*

Well, first I found the distance between Q/2 and Q/2. Then I applied this equation http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y178/besuu4/b836e8b8cc7c00400c5910d3eca76e37.png to find Q. The problem is I don't have F (force) value to solved it by using the equation I provided. Anyway...I am just confusing myself. Hints are welcome. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • aachtcd0.gif
    aachtcd0.gif
    2 KB · Views: 608
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that the charges are not moving. This means they must be in equillibrium. Set up a free body diagram.
 
You are told to ignore the mass of the wires. But don't ignore the mass of the charges.

Assume this occurs on Earth. (Weight a minute, is this a clue to the "missing force"?)

Can you say "trigonometry"?
 
I think I get your clue, Chi Meson.

I know this is oscesles (sp?) triangle so the other two angle must be equal which is 60 degrees. I then used Sin(30)=X/78=39 to find the length and mutliple by 2 to get the full length (happened to be 78cm).

Then I used F=ma to find the force. F=(.024kg)(9.8m/s^2)=.2352N.
after that, I used this equation http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y178/besuu4/b836e8b8cc7c00400c5910d3eca76e37.png to solve for Q.

.2352N=1/4*pi*8.85e-12*(Q^2/78cm^2)
So the answer is Q=1.59e-7 C, correct?
 
so...right or not? Thanks.
 
Not quite! The forces don't have to be equal for equilibrium as they're not in opposite directions. Also, the charge on each ball isn't Q. Inquire further for more help.
 
joanne,

Start by identifying all the forces acting on one of the spheres. (I count three forces acting.) Label the forces in a diagram, then apply the conditions for static equilibrium: The net force must be zero. (Hint: Write two equations. One for vertical components; one for horizontal components.)
 
Well not quite for vertical and horizontal... right? But yeah for two perpendicular directions. See if you can find out which :)
Edit: well I guess it doesn't matter, but one way you can ignore 1 of the 3 forces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
978
Replies
1
Views
820
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K