Determine the total charge needed to apply to the electroscope.

In summary: That is by trig. The formula from the first post is wrong as you said.Let's not stick to that "first post" conversation too much since it seems much unnecessary to stress too much about the previous wrong answer. As you said before, the following equation is correct:## Q = 2d\sqrt{\dfrac{mg\tan(\theta)}{k}} ####d## is the distance between the charges. With trig, the distance between the sphere and the vertical is ##(78 \times 10^{-2})\sin(26^{\circ})##. Multiply that by 2 to get ##2(78 \times 10^{-
  • #1
NasuSama
326
3

Homework Statement



A large electroscope is made with "leaves" that are [itex]78[/itex]-cm-long wires with tiny [itex]24[/itex]-g spheres at the ends. When charged, nearly all the charge resides on the spheres.

If the wires each make a [itex]26^{\circ}[/itex] angle with the vertical, what total charge [itex]Q[/itex] must have been applied to the electroscope? Ignore the mass of the wires.

Homework Equations



[itex]F = mg[/itex]
[itex]F = \dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r^2}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Tried this way:

[itex]F_{\text{electrostatic}} = F_{\text{gravity}}[/itex]
[itex]\dfrac{k(\frac{Q}{2}(\frac{Q}{2}))}{r^2} = mg\cos(\theta)[/itex]

[itex]r = 2L\sin(\theta) [/itex] is the distance between the two spheres and the length of the string, so we have

[itex]Q = 4L\sin(\theta)\sqrt{\dfrac{mg\cos(\theta)}{k}} \approx 6.63 \times 10^{-6} C[/itex]

But the answer is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why would the electrostatic force be equal to the gravitational force? That would only be the case if the angle of the wires was 45° from vertical...

Why would the gravitational force depend upon the angle (mg cos(θ))?

Why not draw the setup and the FBD for one of the spheres?
 
  • #3
So much stressed with this problem since it's pretty hard to work out. Also, there are so many wrong answers online.

Working out with the free-body diagram from the paper I drew, I have

[itex]\Sigma F_x = F_T \cos(\theta) - mg = 0 \rightarrow F_T = \dfrac{mg}{\cos(\theta)}[/itex]
[itex]\Sigma F_y = F_T \sin(\theta) - F_E = 0 \rightarrow F_E = F_T\sin(\theta) = mg\tan(\theta)[/itex]
[itex]F_E = k\dfrac{(\frac{Q}{2})^2}{d^2} = mg\tan(\theta) \rightarrow Q = 2d\sqrt{\dfrac{mgtan(\theta)}{k}}[/itex]

I got [itex]5.6 \times 10^{-6} \mbox{C}[/itex] but still marked wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
NasuSama said:
[itex]F_E = k\dfrac{(\frac{Q}{2})^2}{d^2} = mg\tan(\theta) \rightarrow Q = 2d\sqrt{\dfrac{mgtan(\theta)}{k}}[/itex]

I got [itex]5.6 \times 10^{-6} \mbox{C}[/itex] but still marked wrong.

Your formula looks correct to me. But I get a different numerical answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
What did you get in two sig fig, TSny? I want to be sure that I get the correct answer for the problem. MasteringPhysics, the physics HW system, is a big problem for me since it has some problems with answer-checking.

The actual solution is [itex]5.569457441... \times 10^{-6}[/itex] C. In terms of 2 sig. fig., I obtain [itex]5.6 \times 10^{-6}[/itex] C. I want to double-check the answer with yours.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Show your calculation with numbers. Maybe we can spot an error.
 
  • #7
NasuSama said:
What did you get in two sig fig, TSny? I want to be sure that I get the correct answer for the problem. MasteringPhysics, the physics HW system, is a big problem for me since it has some problems with answer-checking.

The actual solution is [itex]5.569457441... \times 10^{-6}[/itex] C. In terms of 2 sig. fig., I obtain [itex]5.6 \times 10^{-6}[/itex] C. I want to double-check the answer with yours.

The post was edited while you made the post. Here is the solution I posted already.
 
  • #8
I meant to show the details of plugging the numbers into the formula. In particular, what value did you use for d? for m? I don't get an answer near 5.6 μC.
 
  • #9
Here is the actual set up.

[itex] Q = 2(78 \times 10^{-2} \mbox{m})\sqrt{\dfrac{(24 \times 10^{-3} \mbox{kg})(9.8 \mbox{m}/\mbox{s}^2) \tan(26^{\circ})}{9.0 \times 10^{9} \mbox{N}\cdot \mbox{m}^2/\mbox{C}}} [/itex]

where...

[itex]d = 78 \times 10^{-2} \mbox{m}[/itex]
[itex]m = 24 \times 10^{-3} \mbox{kg}[/itex]
 
  • #10
Think about your value of ##d##. Is it correct?
 
  • #11
TSny said:
Think about your value of ##d##. Is it correct?

To me, I believe it's correct since 1 m = 100 cm.
 
  • #12
NasuSama said:
[itex]F_E = k\dfrac{(\frac{Q}{2})^2}{d^2}[/itex]

What does ##d## represent physically in this equation?
 
  • #13
TSny said:
What does ##d## represent physically in this equation?

Oops. Forgot the "basics". Sorry about that.

##d## represents the distance between "charges". So with trig, I got [itex]d = 78 \times 10^{-2}\sin(26^{\circ} \mbox{m})[/itex] Thus, we have:

[itex] Q = 2(78 \times 10^{-2} \times \sin(26^{\circ}) \mbox{m})\sqrt{\dfrac{(24 \times 10^{-3} \mbox{kg})(9.8 \mbox{m}/\mbox{s}^2) \tan(26^{\circ})}{9.0 \times 10^{9} \mbox{N}\cdot \mbox{m}^2/\mbox{C}}} [/itex]

...which is approximately 2.4 x 10-6 C.
 
  • #14
NasuSama said:
##d## represents the distance between "charges". So with trig, I got [itex]d = 78 \times 10^{-2}\sin(26^{\circ} \mbox{m})[/itex]

Still not quite right. You had it correct in your first post (where you used ##r## instead of ##d##).
 
  • #15
TSny said:
Still not quite right. You had it correct in your first post (where you used ##r## instead of ##d##).

But then ##r = 2L\sin(\theta)##. Why is it that?
 
  • #16
I don't get an answer of 6.6 μC when I plug in the numbers.
 
  • #17
Note that your formula for Q was not correct in the first post.
 
  • #18
NasuSama said:
But then ##r = 2L\sin(\theta)##. Why is it that?
That's what you wrote for ##r##. How did you get that?
 
  • #19
TSny said:
That's what you wrote for ##r##. How did you get that?

That is by trig. The formula from the first post is wrong as you said.

Let's not stick to that "first post" conversation too much since it seems much unnecessary to stress too much about the previous wrong answer. As you said before, the following equation is correct:

## Q = 2d\sqrt{\dfrac{mg\tan(\theta)}{k}} ##

##d## is the distance between the charges. With trig, the distance between the sphere and the vertical is ##(78 \times 10^{-2})\sin(26^{\circ})##. Multiply that by 2 to get ##2(78 \times 10^{-2})\sin(26^{\circ})##. Thus, d could be that value.
 
  • #20
NasuSama said:
As you said before, the following equation is correct:

## Q = 2d\sqrt{\dfrac{mg\tan(\theta)}{k}} ##

##d## is the distance between the charges. With trig, the distance between the sphere and the vertical is ##(78 \times 10^{-2})\sin(26^{\circ})##. Multiply that by 2 to get ##2(78 \times 10^{-2})\sin(26^{\circ})##. Thus, d could be that value.

Yes, that's correct. ##d = 2L\text{sin}\theta##. But note that in the formula for Q, d is multiplied by 2. So, there's a factor of 2 in calculating d and another factor of 2 in the formula for Q.
 
  • #21
TSny said:
Yes, that's correct. ##d = 2L\text{sin}\theta##. But note that in the formula for Q, d is multiplied by 2. So, there's a factor of 2 in calculating d and another factor of 2 in the formula for Q.

So the actual expression (after substitution) is this:

##Q = 4L\sin(\theta)\sqrt{\dfrac{mg\tan(\theta)}{k}}##
 
  • #22
NasuSama said:
So the actual expression (after substitution) is this:

##Q = 4L\sin(\theta)\sqrt{\dfrac{mg\tan(\theta)}{k}}##

Yes, that's right.
 
  • #23
TSny said:
Yes, that's right.

Thus,

## Q = 4(78 \times 10^{-2} \mbox{m})\sin(26^{\circ})\sqrt{\dfrac{(24 \times 10^{-3} \mbox{kg})(9.8 \mbox{m}/\mbox{s}^2)\tan(26^{\circ})}{9.0 \times 10^{9} \mbox{N}\cdot\mbox{m}^2/\mbox{C}^2}} ##
## = 4.88298... \times 10^{-6} \mbox{C}##
## \approx 4.9 \times 10^{-6} \mbox{C}##
 
  • #24
That looks good. Same answer that I got, anyway.
 

1. How do you determine the total charge needed to apply to an electroscope?

To determine the total charge needed to apply to an electroscope, you will need to know the capacitance and potential difference of the electroscope. The total charge can then be calculated using the equation Q = CV, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the potential difference.

2. What is the capacitance of an electroscope?

The capacitance of an electroscope is a measure of its ability to store electrical charge. It is typically measured in farads (F) and is dependent on the size and shape of the electroscope's conductive plates, as well as the distance between them.

3. How do you measure the potential difference of an electroscope?

The potential difference of an electroscope can be measured using a voltmeter. The voltmeter is connected to the electroscope's conductive plates and will display the potential difference between them.

4. What factors can affect the total charge needed to apply to an electroscope?

The total charge needed to apply to an electroscope can be affected by the capacitance and potential difference of the electroscope, as well as the presence of any external electric fields. Additionally, the material of the electroscope's conductive plates and the humidity of the surrounding environment can also affect the total charge needed.

5. Can the total charge needed to apply to an electroscope ever be negative?

No, the total charge needed to apply to an electroscope can never be negative. Electrical charge is a fundamental property of matter and can only be positive or negative. An electroscope can only hold a certain amount of charge, and if the applied charge exceeds this limit, the excess charge will simply be repelled.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
401
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
690
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
752
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
891
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
631
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
813
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
912
Back
Top