Electrostatic Potential Energy with Constant Electric Field vs NonConstant Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of electrostatic potential energy (PE) in varying electric fields. The equation PE = V*q = E*q*d is applicable when the electric field (E) is constant, such as in a parallel plate capacitor scenario. However, when dealing with non-constant electric fields, particularly as a charge approaches another charge, the voltage difference must be calculated instead. The relationship V = -E*d is valid only under constant electric field conditions, while calculus-based physics provides a more comprehensive approach for varying fields through integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatic potential energy (PE)
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and equations
  • Knowledge of voltage and its relationship to electric fields
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric fields in parallel plate capacitors
  • Learn about the integration of electric fields to calculate potential differences
  • Explore the implications of non-constant electric fields in electrostatics
  • Review calculus-based physics applications in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatic potential energy in varying electric fields.

Hereformore
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
When determining potential energy we have the relationship:

PE = V*q = E*q*d

But depending on the scenario we can't use them interchangeable right?

If you want to calculate the work needed to be done by a particle going from a distance Y to right next to another particle of the same charge, then you couldn't use PE = E*q*d since the electric field wouldn't be the same as the particle got closer and closer.

But you could use the voltage relationship here if you calculated the voltage difference between the two points.

In what situation would you be able to use the PE= E*q*d? Where there is a constant electric field between two particles? (so not between a parallel plate capacitor).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hereformore said:
In what situation would you be able to use the PE= E*q*d? Where there is a constant electric field between two particles? (so not between a parallel plate capacitor).
In situations where constant external field acts on a particle
 
Hereformore,
don't u think that with the change in the electric field, there is also a change in the distance... so the net result of E*d*q can be constant. So why do u need to have a constant electric field to use the equation ?
 
Hereformore said:
If you want to calculate the work needed to be done by a particle going from a distance Y to right next to another particle of the same charge, then you couldn't use PE = E*q*d since the electric field wouldn't be the same as the particle got closer and closer.
You cannot calculate the work of the electric force which cause the movement of a charge between two points with PE = E*q*d, not because the not uniform field, but because the work you are looking for, is the work between two points, and the PE is the work between a point and infinit.(were we set for convenience zero (Nullpunkt), and every value of potential is measured with respect to that zero)
 
Basically, your equations are the same, except that V is replaced by E*d.
That's because V = E*d, (or more conventionally, V = -E*d) for cases in which E is constant. Actually, a parallel plate capacitor is a good example of where you can use this equation, since a parallel plate capacitor has a roughly constant E field between the plates, as long as you stay away from the edges.

This should all become very clear with calculus-based physics, where V = -E*d is just a special case of
##V = -\int \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{s}##
which is valid when E is varying along the path.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K