Electrostatic Problem - finding initial separation of two particles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two charged particles with given masses and charges that are initially held in place and then released. The objective is to find the initial separation between the particles after they have been released and are moving apart, with specific speeds provided at a known separation distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy and momentum to relate the initial conditions to the final states of the particles. There are questions about how to incorporate the speeds of the particles and the electric potential energy into the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the conservation of momentum and energy equations, while others are verifying the correctness of their calculations and assumptions. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between potential energy, kinetic energy, and the distances involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement, which includes specific values for mass and charge, as well as the requirement to find the initial separation based on the final speeds and distance. There is a noted concern about the reasonableness of the calculated distances.

AaronMartin
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One particle has a mass of 3.00 \times 10^{-3} kg and a charge of +8.00 \mu C. A second particle has a mass of 6.00 \times 10^{-3} kg and the same charge. The two particles are initially held in place and then released. The particles fly apart, and when the separation between them is 0.100 m, the speed of the 3.00 \times 10^{-3} kg particle is 125 m/s. Find the initial separation between the particles.


Homework Equations


V = \frac{kq}{r}, E = \frac{F}{q} or E=\frac{kq}{r^2}, U = qV, F=\frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2}, \frac{1}{2}mv^2_A + U_A = \frac{1}{2}mv^2_B + U_B


The Attempt at a Solution


I can easily calculate the force of repulsion between the two particles and the electric field vectors from each particle. I don't know how to include the speed to find the initial distance.

Thank you to anyone who can help me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using the last equation, remembering that the velocity of both particles is initially 0.

Also, because no external forces act on the two particles, there's a quantity other than energy that's conserved. What is it?
 
Momentum.

\begin{aligned}\rho_{before} &= \rho_{after}\\ mv_1 + mv_2 &= mv_1 + mv_2\\ 0 &= -125 \times 3.00 \times 10^{-3} + 6.00 \times 10^{-3}v_2\\v_2 &= \frac{125 \times 3.00 \times 10^{-3}}{6.00 \times 10^{-3}}\\ &=62.5\,m/s \end{aligned}

How can I use the conservation of energy to work out the distance? I don't know the potentials.
 
You've written down the necessary equations to work out the potentials in your first post!
 
Is this correct?
<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> \frac{1}{2}mv^2_A + U_A &amp;= \frac{1}{2}m^2_B + U_B\\<br /> 0 + U_A &amp; = \left(\frac{1}{2}mv^2_1 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2_2 \right) + U_B<br /> \end{aligned}<br />
where \begin{aligned} U_B &amp;= qV\\ &amp;=q \times \frac{kq}{r}\\ &amp;= \frac{8.99 \times 10^9}{0.100}\end{aligned}
Since I know v1 = 125 m/s and v2 = 62.5 m/s and if U_B is correct, then all I have to do is find U_A and then use U = qV and find r?
 
AaronMartin said:
Is this correct?
<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> \frac{1}{2}mv^2_A + U_A &amp;= \frac{1}{2}m^2_B + U_B\\<br /> 0 + U_A &amp; = \left(\frac{1}{2}mv^2_1 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2_2 \right) + U_B<br /> \end{aligned}<br />
where \begin{aligned} U_B &amp;= qV\\ &amp;=q \times \frac{kq}{r}\\ &amp;= \frac{8.99 \times 10^9}{0.100}\end{aligned}
Since I know v1 = 125 m/s and v2 = 62.5 m/s and if U_B is correct, then all I have to do is find U_A and then use U = qV and find r?

You seem to have forgotten to multiply by q2. Other than that, yes, all you have to do is find U_A and use U=qV again.
 
Ok. To continue where I left off:
<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> U_A &amp;= (0.5 \times 3.00 \times 10^{-3} \times (-125)^2 + 0.5 \times 6.00 \times 10^{-3} \times 62.5^2) + \frac{8.99 \times 10^9 \times (8.00 \times 10^{-6})^2}{0.100}\\<br /> &amp;= 2.53 \times 10^7\,J\\<br /> \\<br /> U_A &amp;= qV\\<br /> V &amp;= \frac{U_A}{q}\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{2.53 \times 10^7}{8.00 \times 10^{-6}}\\<br /> &amp;= 3.16 \times 10^{12}\\<br /> \\<br /> V &amp;= \frac{kq}{r}\\<br /> r&amp;=\frac{kq}{V}\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{8.99 \times 10^9 \times 8.00 \times 10^{-6}}{3.12 \times 10^{12}}\\<br /> &amp;= 2.28 \times 10^{-8}\,m\\<br /> &amp;= 22.8\,nm<br /> \end{aligned}<br />
Is that a reasonable answer? Is it correct? It seems far too small to me.
 
AaronMartin said:
<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> U_A &amp;= (0.5 \times 3.00 \times 10^{-3} \times (-125)^2 + 0.5 \times 6.00 \times 10^{-3} \times 62.5^2) + \frac{8.99 \times 10^9 \times (8.00 \times 10^{-6})^2}{0.100}\\<br /> &amp;= 2.53 \times 10^7\,J\\<br /> <br /> \end{aligned}<br />

You made a math error on this line; the answer should be much smaller.
 
Thanks. I must have missed a bracket or something.
U_A = 40.9\,J
The answer should now be 0.014 m or 1.4 cm. This seems a bit more reasonable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
837
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K