MHB Electrostatic self-potential energy

jacobi1
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Find the electrostatic self potential energy of a spherical charge distribution with charge density $$\rho$$ and radius $$R$$. The self potential energy is the work required to increase the radius of the sphere from $$r$$ to $$r+dr$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wow, I forgot this was even here.
I'll post a solution, since I don't like unanswered threads.
The electrostatic self-potential energy is the amount of work required to increase the radius of a spherically symmetric charge distribution from r to r+dr. From the definition of voltage, $$dW=Vdq$$. The charge dq is $$4 \pi \rho r^2$$. The potential V is $$\frac{kq}{r}=\frac{4 \pi \rho k r^3}{3r}=\frac{4 \pi \rho k r^2}{3}$$. $$k$$ is the Coulomb's Law constant, $$k=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}$$. Multiplying these two expressions, we have $$\frac{16 \pi^2 \rho^2 k r^4}{3}$$. Integrating from 0 to R (increasing the radius from 0 to R by putting on more and more shells), we have
$$\frac{16}{3} \pi^2 \rho^2 k \int_0^R r^4 dr=\frac{16}{15} \pi^2 \rho^2 k R^5[/math] as our answer.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top