Electrostatics, potential between and outside concentric spheres

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in electrostatics involving two concentric conducting spherical shells with specified potentials. The original poster attempts to find the potential between the shells and outside them, while grappling with boundary conditions and the appropriate mathematical framework for the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of Laplacian in spherical coordinates and Legendre polynomials to solve the problem. The original poster questions whether to treat the potential in two separate regions or to find a single expression for the entire space. There is also discussion about the isotropic nature of the potential and its implications for the differential equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest working in two regions separately and applying appropriate boundary conditions for each. The original poster has made progress in defining the potential in one region but expresses concern about the sign of the potential. There is a recognition of the need to analyze the outer region and its relationship to the inner shell's influence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of boundary conditions, particularly the potential at infinity and the implications of the inner shell's charge distribution on the outer region's potential. There is uncertainty regarding the effects of the inner shell on the potential outside the configuration.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi there. I have this problem which I was trying to solve, but I couldn't fit the boundary conditions.

The exercise says: Two conducting spherical shells with radii a and b are concentrically disposed and charged at potentials φa and φb respectively. If rb>ra, find the potential between the shells and for points r>rb.

attachment.php?attachmentid=39834&stc=1&d=1318259052.png


Well, at first I tried to attack this as Griffith does in chapter 3. At first considered the Laplacian in spherical coordinates with azimuthal symmetry
\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} \left ( rV \right ) + \frac{1}{r^2 \sin \theta} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \left ( \sin \theta \frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} \right )=0

The solution are Legendre polynomials:
V(r,\theta)=\Sigma_{l=0}^{\infty}\left (A_lr^l+\frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}}\right )P_l(\cos\theta)

Then I tried to fit the boundary conditions, at first I tried to use all of them. I've defined the potentials as V0 at ra, and V=0 at rb.

Boundary conditions: V(r_a)=V_0,V(r_b)=0,V \rightarrow 0 if r \rightarrow \infty

So, as I thought V should accomplish all of this, because of the last condition I assumed A=0 for all l's.

And then tried to use the first condition.
V(r,\theta)=\Sigma_{l=0}^{\infty} \frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}} P_l(\cos\theta)
V(r_a,\theta)= \frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}} \frac{2}{2l+1}=V_0\int_0^{\pi}P_{l'}\cos \theta\sin\theta d\theta

Now I think this is wrong, perhaps I can make this fit one of the conditions (the one that gives potential zero for rb), but I think I can't make it fit the other. I think I should considered the problem in two parts and find the potential between the shells using two boundary conditions, and outside the bigger shell using another two boundary conditions. I need some help with this. Should I attack the problem as I think I should, finding the potential for the inner configuration and the outer configuration as different problems or it can be found an expression for V on the entire space on a straight way using the three boundary conditions simultaneously?

I actually thought that I could get a simpler differential equation by considering that the configuration gives an isotropic conditions for phi, but also for theta, I think this is wrong, but I'm not sure.

I would get then (dv/dtheta=0):

\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} \left ( rV \right )=0
and that's easier to solve, but I think its wrong because then I wouldn't distinguish from the symmetry on this problem and the one involving two infinite concentric cylinders (perhaps the only difference is the third condition for the potential at infinity).

Bye there, thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • esf.PNG
    esf.PNG
    1.1 KB · Views: 764
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So where you are going wrong is that there are actually two regions for you to consider. One is r > b (region I) and the other is a < r < b (region II). Since the first region contains infinity you must set A=0. But the same is not true for the second region.

Work in two of the regions separately. Apply separate boundary conditions in both regions. You should get your answer.
 
Thanks. I just did it this way, I considered the region a<r<b. And I considered that there is no change on V not for theta neither for phi. I've expressed it in spherical this way:
\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial }{\partial r} \left ( r^2\frac{\partial V}{\partial r} \right )+\frac{1}{r^2 \sin \theta} \frac{\partial }{\partial \theta} \left ( \sin \theta \frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} \right )+\frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} \left ( \frac{\partial^2 V }{\partial \Phi^2} \right )=0
As I considered V as isotropic for Phi and theta (I mean there is no variation of the field on the theta and Phi directions) I get this single differential equation:
\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial }{\partial r} \left ( r^2\frac{\partial V}{\partial r} \right )=0
And working this just a bit:
\frac{\partial V}{\partial r} +\frac{r}{2} \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial r^2}=0
The solution I get for this differential equation is:
V(r)=-\frac{C_1}{r}+C_2
Then under the conditions V(a)=V_0 V(b)=0 I get C_2=\frac{C_1}{b},C_1=\frac{V_0}{\left ( \frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{a} \right )}
This is for the region a<r<b

Is this right? I should work the outer region then. But the thing that bothers me here is that I'm getting a negative potential (perhaps is just some silly mistake with the signs, but perhaps I did it all wrong).
 
I don't see how you are getting a negative potential. I'm positive its positive!

Ya, now you should do the same for the outer region!
 
Oh, you're right! C1 is negative, then -C1 is positive, thank you very much :)

For the region outside the inner spherical shell doesn't affect at all, right? or should I consider as it isn't at 0 potential that I have some kind of charge distributed over it?
 
If I consider that the inner shell doesn't affect at all I get that the potential is 0 over the entire space outside the configuration, for r>b, I think I'm doing something wrong. A is zero, so it won't blow up at infinity, V(b)=0.

V(b,\theta)=\Sigma_{l=0}^{\infty}\frac{B_l}{b^{l+1}} P_l(\cos\theta)=0

Then Bl must be zero and V=0 for the outer region?
 
Last edited:
That's the right answer for the boundary conditions given.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
thanks praharmitra :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K