Elementary particle Pauli’s exclusion principle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the omega minus particle, which has a spin of 3/2. Participants are tasked with calculating the magnitude of its spin angular momentum and the angles it makes with the z-axis, while also considering whether it adheres to the Pauli exclusion principle.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of spin angular momentum and the angles associated with it. There is confusion regarding the application of the cosine relationship for determining angles. Questions arise about the implications of the particle being a fermion and its compliance with the Pauli exclusion principle.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the definitions of fermions and bosons, and how these relate to the Pauli exclusion principle. Some participants provide insights into the nature of wave functions for indistinguishable particles, but there is no explicit consensus on the application of these concepts to the omega minus particle.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly the characteristics of particles with half-integer spins and the implications for their quantum states. There is an emphasis on understanding the foundational principles rather than reaching a definitive conclusion.

8614smith
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An elementary particle called the omega minus has spin 3/2. Calculate the magnitude of the spin angular momentum for this particle and the possible angles the spin angular momentum vector makes with the z-axis. Does this particle obey Pauli’s exclusion principle?


Homework Equations


[tex]\bar{S}=\sqrt{s(s+1)}\hbar[/tex]
[tex]cos\frac{S_Z}{\bar{S_Z}}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


using the eqn. i get the right answer for S, [tex]\frac{\sqrt{15}}{2}[/tex]

But using the 2nd eqn. i can't get the right angles, the right angles are: 39.2, 75.0, 105.0, 140.8. And why would the particle obey the pauli exclusion principle??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since cosine is adjacent over hypotenuse, it should be: Cos(phi)=Sz/S

You can get different values of phi for different Sz

As far as the Pauli exclusion principle, do you know the difference between Fermions and Bosons, and what spins each has?
 
Matterwave said:
Since cosine is adjacent over hypotenuse, it should be: Cos(phi)=Sz/S

You can get different values of phi for different Sz

As far as the Pauli exclusion principle, do you know the difference between Fermions and Bosons, and what spins each has?

Sorry, yes that's what i meant to write,

[tex]cos(\theta)=\frac{S_Z}{\bar{S}}[/tex]

Fermions have half integer spin, bosons have integer spin or is it the other way round?

so as the particle has half integer spin its a fermion and no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously...i don't see how i can tell if it obeys the principle or not
 
The statement "no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously" is precisely the Pauli exclusion principle.

You can tell whether particles obey the principle or not by whether they are fermions or bosons. Fermions obey the principle, and bosons do not. Fermions have half-integer spins, and bosons have integer spins.

The real reason the two kinds of particles behave this way has to do with the set-up of the combined wave function for 2 indistinguishable particles. Fermions have wave functions which are anti-symmetric, while Bosons have symmetric wave functions. If 2 Fermions were occupying the same state, their wave functions would disappear.
 
Matterwave said:
The real reason the two kinds of particles behave this way has to do with the set-up of the combined wave function for 2 indistinguishable particles. Fermions have wave functions which are anti-symmetric, while Bosons have symmetric wave functions. If 2 Fermions were occupying the same state, their wave functions would disappear.

Are you talking about even and odd functions here? as in even about the y axis? and that is why their wave functions disappear - because of destructive interference?
 
Yes, even and odd functions.

For example, 2 fermion's wave function may be described as such (not worrying about normalization atm): (Assume 2 states, A and B, in which 2 particles 1 and 2 are)

PsiA(x1)PsiB(x2)-PsiA(x2)PsiB(x1) (notice the negative sign, it's what defines the 2 particles as fermions)

If I assume x1 and x2 are interchangeable (that is, indistinguishable), and that the two particles are both in state A, then my total wavefunction becomes:

PsiA(x1)PsiA(x2)-PsiA(x1)PsiA(x2)=0

For a boson, the sign is a plus sign instead of a minus sign. In which case you just get 2PisA(x1)PsiB(x2) instead of 0 (again, neglecting normalization).
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K