Where Am I Going Wrong in Sakurai's Quantum Spin Eigenvalue Problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the eigenvalue problem presented in problem 1.8 of Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics," specifically finding the eigenket \vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle. The user attempts to express \vec S\cdot\hat n using the Pauli matrices and Cartesian coordinates defined by the angles alpha and beta. The user encounters confusion regarding the arbitrary nature of beta and the resulting equations, leading to contradictions such as cosines equaling 2. Clarification is sought on the formulation of the matrix equations and the roles of alpha and beta in determining the eigenvalues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly eigenvalue problems.
  • Familiarity with Pauli sigma matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of spherical to Cartesian coordinate transformations, specifically \hat n = (\sin\alpha\cos\beta,\sin\alpha\sin\beta,\cos\alpha).
  • Experience with solving matrix equations and characteristic polynomials in linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in quantum mechanics, focusing on the implications of fixed angles alpha and beta.
  • Study the properties and applications of Pauli matrices in quantum spin systems.
  • Explore the concept of eigenstates in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to angular momentum.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in solving eigenvalue problems, especially in the context of quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and practitioners of quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling eigenvalue problems and seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum spin systems and matrix formulations.

Theage
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am currently working on a seemingly straightforward eigenvalue problem appearing as problem 1.8 in Sakurai's Modern QM. He asks us to find an eigenket \vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle with \vec S\cdot\hat n\vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle = \frac\hbar 2\vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle where the unit vector n is defined by polar angle alpha and azimuthal angle beta.

Homework Equations



The definitions of the Pauli sigma matrices, along with the formula \hat n = (\sin\alpha\cos\beta,\sin\alpha\sin\beta,\cos\alpha) for conversion to Cartesian coordinates.

The Attempt at a Solution



\vec S\cdot\hat n = \frac\hbar 2\sin\alpha\cos\beta\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}+\sin\alpha\sin\beta\begin{pmatrix}0&-i\\i&0\end{pmatrix}+\cos\alpha\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix} = \frac\hbar 2\begin{pmatrix}\cos\alpha&\sin\alpha e^{-i\beta}\\\sin\alpha e^{i\beta}&-\cos\alpha\end{pmatrix}. Thus we have the \lambda=1 eigenvalue problem for the matrix \begin{pmatrix}\cos\alpha&e^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha\\e^{i\beta}\sin\alpha&-\cos\alpha\end{pmatrix}. This becomes the system of equations \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x\cos\alpha+ye^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha-x\\-y\cos\alpha+xe^{i\beta}\sin\alpha-y\end{pmatrix}. Thus beta appears to be completely arbitrary, and alpha = n*pi, however this appears to have no solutions as we get cosines equaling 2 which is nonsense. The characteristic polynomial predicts a lambda=1 eigenvalue - where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theage said:
Thus we have the \lambda=1 eigenvalue problem for the matrix \begin{pmatrix}\cos\alpha&e^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha\\e^{i\beta}\sin\alpha&-\cos\alpha\end{pmatrix}.
This looks good to me.

This becomes the system of equations \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x\cos\alpha+ye^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha-x\\-y\cos\alpha+xe^{i\beta}\sin\alpha-y\end{pmatrix}.

I don't understand your matrix on the right hand side. How did you get the ##-x## and the ##-y## terms on the far right of the matrix?

##\alpha## and ##\beta## are fixed by the choice of ##\hat{n}##. You need to find ##x## and ##y##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K