yardtick
- 1
- 0
If super nova is responsible for all elements on earth, including the ones that humans were made from, why aren't all elements found on every planet?
The discussion centers around the origins of elements on Earth, particularly in relation to supernovae, and why not all elements are found on every planet. Participants explore the implications of planetary formation and the distribution of elements across different celestial bodies.
Participants express differing views on the distribution of elements across planets, with some asserting that all elements are present in trace amounts while others emphasize the role of formation conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent and implications of these claims.
Limitations include the dependence on specific conditions during planetary formation and the challenges in obtaining comprehensive data on elemental abundances in celestial bodies beyond Earth.
yardtick said:If super nova is responsible for all elements on earth, including the ones that humans were made from, why aren't all elements found on every planet?
This is a nice theory which can explain the position of the planets in our solar system. However, it is known that there are a lot of other planet distributions in other systems - including gas giants very close to the star.manojr said:Within 4AU distance from the Sun, temperature was too high favoring only high melting point materials (iron, silica etc) to gather together to form rocky planets. This matter is rare (i.e. just 1% of total matter) and thus the terrestrial planets could not grow bigger. Further away, lower temperature created ices that gathered together to attract huge quantity of Hydrogen and Helium to become gas giants.
Same here.I'd be willing to bet that all natural stable elements and the longer lived unstable ones are found on every planet in at least trace amounts.