Eliminate Parameter with Sin and Cos

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikeylikesit182
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Parameter Sin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the elimination of the parameter \( t \) from the parametric equations \( x = 2 - \pi \cos t \) and \( y = 2t - \pi \sin t \), with a focus on how to handle the term \( 2t \) in the \( y \) equation. Participants explore methods to derive a single equation in terms of \( x \) and \( y \) while considering the implications for intersection points and tangents.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express understanding of using \( \sin^2 + \cos^2 = 1 \) for parameter elimination but struggle with the \( 2t \) term in the \( y \) equation.
  • One participant suggests that it may not be possible to completely eliminate \( t \), but a relationship involving \( x \), \( y \), and \( t \) can be established.
  • Another participant proposes using derivatives to find slopes at intersection points, indicating a potential method to approach the problem.
  • A method involving rewriting the equations and squaring them to derive a quadratic equation is suggested, leading to a form resembling an ellipse.
  • One participant concludes that the resulting equation appears to represent a circle with radius \( \pi \), though another cautions that the graph itself is not a circle despite the equation's appearance.
  • Discussion includes the need to find values \( t_1 \) and \( t_2 \) for which the coordinates \( (x(t_1), y(t_1)) \) and \( (x(t_2), y(t_2)) \) are identical, indicating potential self-intersection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the complete elimination of \( t \) or the exact nature of the graph, with some suggesting it resembles a circle while others dispute this characterization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to fully address the parameter elimination and the implications for the graph's shape.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps required to eliminate \( t \) completely and the dependence on interpretations of the resulting equations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of determining intersection points in parametric equations.

Mikeylikesit182
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
x = 2 − π cos t
y = 2t − π sin t
−π ≤ t < π
I understand how to eliminate parameter using sin^2 + cos^2 = 1.
I can't figure out how to deal with the "2t" in the y equation, if you solve for sin(t) and square, you get
((2t-y)/π )^2 which leaves the parameter. Is there a way to get it into the argument of sin?
I need this to then figure out intersection points and tangents later. Thanks in advance for any insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mikeylikesit182 said:
x = 2 − π cos t
y = 2t − π sin t
−π ≤ t < π
I understand how to eliminate parameter using sin^2 + cos^2 = 1.
I can't figure out how to deal with the "2t" in the y equation, if you solve for sin(t) and square, you get
((2t-y)/π )^2 which leaves the parameter. Is there a way to get it into the argument of sin?
I need this to then figure out intersection points and tangents later. Thanks in advance for any insight!

You will not be able to completely eliminate ##t##, but you can use these 2 equations to write a single equation that depends on ##x,y## and ##t## (but not ##\sin t,\cos t##). There is an interesting geometric interpretation of the equation that we can discuss after you try to find it.
 
fzero said:
You will not be able to completely eliminate ##t##, but you can use these 2 equations to write a single equation that depends on ##x,y## and ##t## (but not ##\sin t,\cos t##). There is an interesting geometric interpretation of the equation that we can discuss after you try to find it.

Thank you for the help! I can't figure what that equation would be ( I can see one involving arccos and substitution but I think that would be a dead end.)
I thought maybe finding the derivative dy/dx for the parametric eqn and realizing that at the point of intersection the 2 slopes would be dy/dx and -dy/dx might lead me closer?
 
Mikeylikesit182 said:
Thank you for the help! I can't figure what that equation would be ( I can see one involving arccos and substitution but I think that would be a dead end.)
I thought maybe finding the derivative dy/dx for the parametric eqn and realizing that at the point of intersection the 2 slopes would be dy/dx and -dy/dx might lead me closer?

Using the derivatives might be of help later, but for now do something simpler. Rewrite the equations in the form

$$\begin{split}
x -2 & = -\pi \cos t, \\
y -2t & = -\pi \sin t\end{split}$$

and then square both and add them (you were close to this in your original attempt). Can you interpret the resulting quadratic equation?
 
fzero said:
Using the derivatives might be of help later, but for now do something simpler. Rewrite the equations in the form

$$\begin{split}
x -2 & = -\pi \cos t, \\
y -2t & = -\pi \sin t\end{split}$$

and then square both and add them (you were close to this in your original attempt). Can you interpret the resulting quadratic equation?

(x-2)^2 = (pi^2)(cos^2(t))
(y-2t)^2 = (pi^2)(sin^2(t))
added =
(x-2)^2 + (y-2t)^2 = (pi^2)(cos^2(t)) + (pi^2)(sin^2(t))
(x-2)^2 + (y-2t)^2 = (pi^2)[(cos^2(t)) + (sin^2(t))]
(x-2)^2 + (y-2t)^2 = (pi^2)
[(x-2)^2]/(pi^2) + [(y-2t)^2]/(pi^2) = 1

It seems to look like an ellipse adjusted upwards by the parameter? I really appreciate the help!
 
Correct. To be precise, it's actually a circle with radius ##\pi##.
 
fzero said:
Correct. To be precise, it's actually a circle with radius ##\pi##.

So it seems at this point to find where the graph would intersect itself, we would ask what value for t would give us 2 sets of identical x,y coordinates?
 
Mikeylikesit182 said:
So it seems at this point to find where the graph would intersect itself, we would ask what value for t would give us 2 sets of identical x,y coordinates?

Actually you want to find values ##t_1## and ##t_2## for which ##( x(t_1),y(t_1))=( x(t_2),y(t_2))##. In this case there is only one pair of such ##t_1,t_2##, but in general there can be more.

Also, I should warn that the graph itself is not a circle, despite the appearance of that equation above.
 
upload_2015-5-2_17-20-14.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K