EM Course Choices: Jackson or Schwinger?

  • Context: Classical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kostas230
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the choice between Jackson's and Schwinger's textbooks for a graduate course in electromagnetism (EM). Participants emphasize that Jackson's book is the standard reference, widely recommended by professors, and contains essential exercises. Schwinger's text, available in Kindle format, is praised for its elegant treatment of complex topics, such as cylindrical Bessel functions. Additionally, alternative recommendations include Landau & Lifshitz vol. 2 and Scheck's Theoretical Physics vol. 3 for a more modern perspective on classical electromagnetism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with classical electromagnetism concepts
  • Understanding of graduate-level physics coursework
  • Knowledge of mathematical techniques such as Bessel functions
  • Experience with academic textbooks and study guides
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Jackson's and Schwinger's textbooks
  • Explore Landau & Lifshitz vol. 2 for advanced classical electromagnetism
  • Investigate Scheck's Theoretical Physics vol. 3 for a modern approach
  • Look into study guides and workbooks like REA or Schaum's for supplemental learning
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, educators in electromagnetism, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of classical electromagnetism through recommended texts.

kostas230
Messages
96
Reaction score
3
So, I'm taking a graduate course on EM and I don't know which textbook to take: Jackson's book or Schwinger's? Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you a prof? What text does he suggest? Presumably the course will have some homework assignments.

There's one sound
That no one knows
What does the prof say?

Jackson is one of those classics that everybody wants everybody else to have read.

Of course, Schwinger is available for Kindle. Oh, for about the same as the paperback version of Jackson.
 
Well, he recommends both of them and he said he will be giving exercises from both of these texts, although I have a feeling that most of these will be from Jackson since it's the standard and there are more copies in the library.
 
I don't know about Schwinger's but Jackon's book is great (trust me).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demforiq
Jackson is the standard source. I like it very much, but Schwinger is simply a master piece, and I like. It's full of gems. Alone the treatment of cylindrical Bessel functions with elegant operator techniques is worth the whole book.

I don't like both books conceptionally wise so much. They are both written from a classical perspective. From a HEP/nuclear theoretical physicist's point of view, classical electromagnetism should be introduced as a relativistic classical quantum field theor (and it's in fact the paradigmatic example of one such theory with the clear advantage that it describes a vast amount of observable facts and has far-reaching applications in electrical engineering, electronics, and optics). The best book from this point of view is, in my opinion, Landau&Lifshitz vol. 2 or Scheck's Theoretical Physics book vol. 3 (I'm not sure whether there's an English translation of the latter, but the German edition is great).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
Hi Hendrik, yes Scheck's book was translated also under Springer Verlag. Indeed, an excellent book.
 
Buy the one most used in class, and if your professor is going to swap about equally, then you probably should buy both. You can buy an older edition of Jackson, it is the standard and older editions are probably readily available for a LOT less money than the newest edition (also look at Indian publishers).

My next advice, buy a study guide if you can and buy an REA or Schaum's workbook. I had a professor that couldn't be bothered with stupid questions (the only kind I knew how to ask...), so that was a necessity for me. We used two textbooks, Jackson and Griffiths. Griffiths was far easier to read and the problems were far easier to do. I suspect Grittiths was really an undergrad text, but it complemented Jacksons and allowed the class to comprehend the more difficult concepts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
859
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K