Emag - Having trouble following an example

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between current density and potential in vacuum-tube diodes, specifically under the space-charge limited condition. The user expresses confusion regarding the derivation of equations involving the velocity of electrons and their kinetic energy. Key equations discussed include the relationship between current density, charge density, and electric field intensity, as well as the application of kinematic equations to express velocity as a function of position. The clarification provided emphasizes the conservation of energy principle in the context of electron motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum-tube diode operation
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations in physics
  • Knowledge of electric fields and potential energy concepts
  • Basic principles of electron dynamics and charge density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of current density equations in vacuum-tube diodes
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in electric fields
  • Explore the application of kinematic equations to electron motion
  • Investigate the effects of space-charge limitations in electronic devices
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists studying electron dynamics, and anyone interested in the principles of vacuum-tube technology and its applications.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble following an example in the book. I don't understand a few steps which I have marked in bold. Any help would be awesome! Thanks.

Q: In vacuum-tube diodes, electrons are emitted from a hot cathode at zero potential and collected by an anode maintained at a potential [itex]V_0[/itex], resulting in a convection current flow. Assuming that the cathode and the anode are parallel conducting plates and that hte electrons leave the cathode with a zero initial velocity (spache-charge limited condition), find the relation between the current density [itex]\vec C[/itex] and [itex]V_0[/itex].

A:
Neglecting fringing effects we have,
[tex]\vec E(0) = \vec a_y E_y(0) = -\vec a_y \frac{dV(y=0)}{dy} = 0[/tex]

In the steady state the current density is constant, independent of y:
[tex]\vec J = -\vec a_y J = \vec a_y \rho(y) u(y)[/tex]
where the charge density [itex]\rho (y)[/itex] is a negative quanitity. The velocity [itex]\vec u = \vec a_y u(y)[/itex] is related to the electric field intensity [itex]\vec E(y) = \vec a_y E(y)[/itex] by Newton's law of motion:
[tex]m \vec{d u(y)}{dt} = -eE(y) = e \vec{dV(y)}{dy}[/tex], where [itex]m[/itex] and [itex]e[/itex] are the mass and charge respectively of an electron. Noting that:

This is where I am confused. I am not noting anything =)

[tex]m \frac{du}{dt} = m \frac{du}{dy} \frac{dy}{dt} = mu \frac{du}{dy}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} mu^2 \right)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} m u^2 \right) = e \frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]

I don't understand:
[tex]m \frac{du}{dy} \frac{dy}{dt} \rightarrow mu \frac{du}{dy}[/tex]
[tex]mu \frac{du}{dy} \rightarrow \frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} mu^2 \right)[/tex]

and last but not least...
[tex]\frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} m u^2 \right) \rightarrow e \frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This [itex]\vec{a_y}[/itex] business is very confusing. Apparently, [itex]\vec{a_y}[/itex] is just a unit vector in the y direction. There's a symbol for that, it's [itex]\vec{j}[/itex] or [itex]\hat{y}[/itex].

For your first source of confusion:

According to the equations of kinematics,

[tex]u(t)=at[/itex]<br /> [tex]y(t)=\frac{a}{2}t^2[/tex]<br /> <br /> So if you want to write u as a function of y only, it will look like<br /> <br /> [tex]u(y)=\sqrt{2ay}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now,<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{du}{dt}=\frac{du}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{du}{dy}\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{a}{2}t^2)=\frac{du}{dy}at=\frac{du}{dy}u[/tex]For the second:<br /> <br /> [tex]u \frac{du}{dy} = \frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} u^2 \right)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Just differentiate the RHS to see that it is true.Third confusion:<br /> <br /> [itex]\frac{1}{2}mu^2[/itex] is the kinetic energy of an electron. And by conservation of energy, we must have <br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{dK}{dy}=-\frac{dU}{dy}[/tex]<br /> <br /> where U is the potential energy of the electron. But for a charge q, U(y) is also qV(y). Here, q=-e, hence U(y)=-eV(y) and we have<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{dK}{dy}=e\frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]<br /> <br /> This is what <br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} m u^2 \right) = e \frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]<br /> <br /> is expressing.[/tex]
 
ahhhhhhh... I feel like slapping myself ;)

I haven't seen those kinematic equations in awhile, hehe.

Well this question was an awesome review.

quasar987 I can't thank you enough. You are always a huge help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K