In Bernard Schutz's 'A first course in General Relativity', p325 (1st edition) he says(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

" [the constant-time hypersurface of a FLRW spacetime with k=-1 (hyperbolic)] is not realisable as a three-dimensional hypersurface in a four- or higher-dimensional Euclidean space."

On the face of it, this appears to contradict the Strong Whitney Embedding Theorem, which states that :

"any smooth m-dimensional manifold (required also to be Hausdorff and second-countable) can be smoothly embedded in Euclidean 2m-space, if m>0. "

So it should be possible to embed the constant-time hypersurface in Euclidean space of six dimensions, if not less.

Have I misunderstood either Schutz or Whitney here, or is Schutz just wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Embedding hyperbolic constant-time hypersurface in Euclidean space.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Embedding hyperbolic constant | Date |
---|---|

B 2D space embedded in 3D space | Feb 10, 2018 |

I Parabolic motion from hyperbolic motion | Feb 5, 2018 |

I Curved spacetime embedded in noncurved spacetime | Dec 26, 2017 |

I Embeddings of a gauge group | Apr 9, 2017 |

Signature and dimension of embedding space of GR | Aug 10, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**