These two terms would be the simplest terms in the set theory as they are on the first chapter in my textbook. But why cant i understand it?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In my textbook it says

A relation R in a set is a set of ordered pairs, so any subset of a set of ordered pairs will be a relation. This includes the empty set which is referred to as the empty relation.

What is this mean? empty set = empty relation? and if so then why empty relation is symmetric as well as transitive? My teacher said it is done by default but i still can not understand it.

In case of equivalence class i understand the concept and i thought it was easy. An equivalnce relation on Set partitions Set into subsets which are called equivalence classes. Good enough not difficult. But in the example where

A = {1, 2, 3, 4} and define a relation R by: xRy <-> x + y is even.

The relation is equivalence relation. R = {(1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 3), (3, 1), (2, 2), (4, 4), (4, 2)}

and they say equivalence classes : {1, 3} and {2, 4}

This i can not understand.. why only these two? doesnt {1 ,1} {2, 2} {3, 3} {4, 4} counted?

Set theory is too hard..I thought i understood everything and when i look back everything is new! well that must be because i couldnt have enough time for revision but this is too much.

Any definitions of empty relation and equivalence class that can be understood by person like me?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Empty relation and equivalence classes

Loading...

Similar Threads - Empty relation equivalence | Date |
---|---|

B Empty domains and the vacuous truth | Dec 26, 2017 |

Infimum and supremum of empty set | Jul 3, 2015 |

Empty functions and relations | May 14, 2012 |

Empty relation | May 29, 2010 |

Empty relation | Nov 17, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**