Emuberable and Demumerable sets

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sweet springs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of enumerable and denumerable sets in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the basis of states in quantum systems like the harmonic oscillator. Participants explore the implications of these terms and their relationship to the existence of continuous bases in separable spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator has countably infinite sets of states, which can be expressed in both enumerable and denumerable terms.
  • One participant suggests that denumerable sets should be interpreted as countably infinite but not necessarily ordered, while enumerable sets are ordered.
  • Another participant questions the existence of continuous bases in separable spaces, stating that they do not exist.
  • There is a mention of the Nuclear Spectral Theorem and its complexity, with one participant expressing frustration over the lack of a clear proof in standard texts.
  • Several participants reference the need for a background in functional analysis to fully grasp the concepts discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of enumerable and denumerable sets, and there is disagreement regarding the existence of continuous bases in separable spaces. The discussion remains unresolved on these points.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of enumerable and denumerable sets, as well as the unresolved nature of the proofs related to the Nuclear Spectral Theorem.

sweet springs
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
75
Hi. I have a question about numbers of basis in quamutum mechanics space.

Hamiltonian of harmonic oscillator is observable and have countably infinite sets |En>s

Together with position or momentum basis identity equation is,

[tex]|state>=\int|x><x|state>dx=\int|p><p|state>dp=\Sigma_n\ |E_n><E_n|state>[/tex]

The same state is expressed as both enumerable and denumerable infinite sets.

Is it OK? Denumerable sets should be interpreted correctle as enumerable or vice versa?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure - that's fine.

To really understand it though you need to investigate Rigged Hilbert Spaces, but that requires considerable background in analysis:
http://physics.lamar.edu/rafa/webdis.pdf

At he beginning level simply accept you can have both.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aleazk
sweet springs said:
Hi. I have a question about numbers of basis in quamutum mechanics space.

Hamiltonian of harmonic oscillator is observable and have countably infinite sets |En>s

Together with position or momentum basis identity equation is,

[tex]|state>=\int|x><x|state>dx=\int|p><p|state>dp=\Sigma_n\ |E_n><E_n|state>[/tex]

The same state is expressed as both enumerable and denumerable infinite sets.

Is it OK? Denumerable sets should be interpreted correctle as enumerable or vice versa?
Enumerable is essentially a mathermatics term meaning that the set is ordered. Denumerable means countbly infinite, but not necessarily ordered.
 
mathman said:
Enumerable is essentially a mathermatics term meaning that the set is ordered. Denumerable means countbly infinite, but not necessarily ordered.

You are of course correct.

But reading between the lines I am pretty sure he is asking about the existence of continuous basis in separable spaces which is a bit strange until you are used to it.

Thanks
Bill
 
But of course, continuous bases do not exist in separable spaces.
 
Thanks ALL for your advise. I wil learn it.
 
dextercioby said:
But of course, continuous bases do not exist in separable spaces.

Again of course. The RHS formalism is sneaky in making it look like it does by allowing a continuous spectrum.

To the OP its tied up with the so called Nuclear Spectral Theorem which is very difficult to prove - in fact I haven't even seen a proof - the one in the standard text by Gelfland that I studied ages ago is in fact incorrect - don't you hate that sort of thing o0)o0)o0)o0)o0)o0)

However the following details an approach useful in QM based on so called Hilbert-Schmidt Riggings:
http://mathserver.neu.edu/~king_chris/GenEf.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K