Energy and Momentum in Particle Decay

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decay of a particle A into two products, B and C, and explores the conditions under which one of the decay products can be stationary. It is established that while it is theoretically possible for either B or C to be stationary, it requires precise conditions regarding the initial momentum of A and the direction of emission of the non-stationary decay product. A specific example is provided with the decay of a pion (π+) into a muon (μ+) and a muon neutrino (νμ), illustrating the kinematics involved and the energy-momentum conservation principles that govern the decay process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle decay processes, specifically A → B + C.
  • Knowledge of energy conservation and momentum conservation in physics.
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations and their application in particle physics.
  • Basic concepts of kinetic energy and isotropic angular distribution in particle decay.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the kinematics of two-body decays in particle physics.
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their applications in different reference frames.
  • Research the decay processes of pions and their products, focusing on muon and neutrino emissions.
  • Explore energy-momentum conservation laws in particle interactions and decays.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the principles of energy and momentum conservation in particle decay processes.

*FaerieLight*
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
If a particle decays via A →B + C, and A had some initial non-zero momentum, is it possible for either B or C to be stationary? I can't seem to find a restriction on this from energy conservation or momentum conservation.

From energy conservation, the stationary particle B still contributes energy from its rest mass, so C does not need to have the same mass as A. From momentum conservation, C can carry off all the momentum of A, leaving B free to be stationary.

I've never heard of this kind of thing occurring in Nature, and that makes me wonder if it is actually possible for a decay product to be stationary.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*FaerieLight* said:
If a particle decays via A →B + C, and A had some initial non-zero momentum, is it possible for either B or C to be stationary?

It's possible in principle, but very unlikely in practice. First, the initial momentum of A has to be "just right." Second, the non-stationary decay product has to be emitted in exactly the same direction that A was moving.
 
A good example is the two-body pion π+ decay into a muon μ+ and muon neutrino νμ. The angular distribution is isotropic. In the pion rest frame, the kinetic energy of the muon is about 4.12 MeV (the range is a few hundred microns in nuclear emulsion). If the pion had a kinetic energy of about 5.45 MeV and the muon decayed backwards, it would be nearly stationary. The muon neutrino would carry away all the pion momentum.
 
The kinematics is rather simple. What you are asking for is

A \to B + C

and e.g.

\vec{p}_B = 0

Now go to the rest frame of particle A, i.e.

p^\mu_A = (m_A, 0) \to p^\mu_B + p^\mu_C = (E_B+E_C, \vec{p}_b+\vec{p}_C)

From energy and momentum conservation you can deduce that the momentum of B and C are antiparallel and add up to zero. From the p's and the masses you can calculate the E's.

What you know need to do is the following; take the momentum of B and construct a Lorentz boost to B's restframe (i.e. such the the new p' of B vanishes). Now apply this Lorentz transformation to A and C.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K