Energy and Momentum in Particle Decay

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of a particle being stationary after a decay process, specifically in the context of the decay A → B + C, where A has an initial non-zero momentum. Participants explore the implications of energy and momentum conservation in this scenario, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible for either B or C to be stationary after the decay, noting that energy conservation allows for B to contribute energy from its rest mass while C carries the momentum.
  • Another participant agrees that it is theoretically possible for one particle to be stationary, but emphasizes that this scenario is highly unlikely due to the specific conditions required for momentum conservation.
  • A third participant provides an example of pion decay, suggesting that under certain conditions, such as the pion having specific kinetic energy, one decay product (the muon) could be nearly stationary while the other (the muon neutrino) carries away the momentum.
  • A fourth participant discusses the kinematics involved, explaining how to analyze the situation using conservation laws and Lorentz transformations to understand the momentum and energy distribution between the decay products.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that while it is theoretically possible for one of the decay products to be stationary, the practical occurrence of such a scenario is unlikely due to the precise conditions required. However, there is no consensus on the likelihood or commonality of such events in nature.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific initial conditions, such as the momentum and energy of the original particle, and the assumptions made regarding the direction of emitted particles.

*FaerieLight*
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
If a particle decays via A →B + C, and A had some initial non-zero momentum, is it possible for either B or C to be stationary? I can't seem to find a restriction on this from energy conservation or momentum conservation.

From energy conservation, the stationary particle B still contributes energy from its rest mass, so C does not need to have the same mass as A. From momentum conservation, C can carry off all the momentum of A, leaving B free to be stationary.

I've never heard of this kind of thing occurring in Nature, and that makes me wonder if it is actually possible for a decay product to be stationary.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*FaerieLight* said:
If a particle decays via A →B + C, and A had some initial non-zero momentum, is it possible for either B or C to be stationary?

It's possible in principle, but very unlikely in practice. First, the initial momentum of A has to be "just right." Second, the non-stationary decay product has to be emitted in exactly the same direction that A was moving.
 
A good example is the two-body pion π+ decay into a muon μ+ and muon neutrino νμ. The angular distribution is isotropic. In the pion rest frame, the kinetic energy of the muon is about 4.12 MeV (the range is a few hundred microns in nuclear emulsion). If the pion had a kinetic energy of about 5.45 MeV and the muon decayed backwards, it would be nearly stationary. The muon neutrino would carry away all the pion momentum.
 
The kinematics is rather simple. What you are asking for is

A \to B + C

and e.g.

\vec{p}_B = 0

Now go to the rest frame of particle A, i.e.

p^\mu_A = (m_A, 0) \to p^\mu_B + p^\mu_C = (E_B+E_C, \vec{p}_b+\vec{p}_C)

From energy and momentum conservation you can deduce that the momentum of B and C are antiparallel and add up to zero. From the p's and the masses you can calculate the E's.

What you know need to do is the following; take the momentum of B and construct a Lorentz boost to B's restframe (i.e. such the the new p' of B vanishes). Now apply this Lorentz transformation to A and C.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K