Energy and roller coaster question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the initial height of a roller coaster using the principles of energy conservation. The equations of potential energy (U = mgh) and kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv²) are applied to determine the height. The correct approach involves using the conservation of energy formula, leading to the conclusion that the initial height (h) is 15.76 meters. However, the calculation was initially misinterpreted, highlighting the importance of correctly applying the conservation of energy principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy (U = mgh)
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv²)
  • Knowledge of the conservation of energy principle
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn about energy transformations in roller coasters
  • Explore advanced problems involving potential and kinetic energy
  • Investigate the effects of friction on roller coaster dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineering students, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of roller coasters and energy conservation principles.

enapper
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A roller coaster starts at height (h). It goes down this hill and then goes up a second hill that is at a height of 28.5 m at a speed of 15.8 m/s. How high was the initial hill?


Given equations:
U=mgh
KE=1/2mv^2
W=Fd
P=W/T



Honestly, we've never done a problem like this before and I'm unsure how to solve it. I know potential energy is at it's highest point at the peak of the first hill and that energy is always conserved, so I said mgh(1)-1/2mv^2(1)=mgh(2)-1/2mv^2, but I didn't get a logical answer. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi enapper! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)

your formula should work …

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong :smile:
 
Thanks!

mgh=mgh(2)-1/2mv^2(2)

I canceled out the mass because it should be the same throughout the equation and no mass is given, leaving me with:
gh=gh(sub2)-1/2v^2(sub2)

(9.8)(h)=(9.8)(28.5)-(1/2)(15.8)^2

9.8h=279.3-124.82

h=154.48/9.8

h=15.76

This answer seems illogical, though, because normally the cart would not be able to exceed the initial height, and the second hill is much higher than 15.76m.
 
oh, on second thoughts your formula was wrong …

it should have a + not a - …

conservation of energy is KE + PE = constant :wink:
 
That makes sense. "The whole is equal to the sum of the parts" sort of thing.
Thanks a million!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K