Energy and roller coaster question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving energy conservation in a roller coaster scenario. The original poster is trying to determine the height of the initial hill given the height of a second hill and the speed of the roller coaster at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of energy principles using potential and kinetic energy equations but expresses uncertainty about their calculations. Some participants suggest reviewing the calculations to identify errors, while others question the application of the conservation of energy concept.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some offering guidance to check calculations and clarify the conservation of energy principle. There is a recognition of potential errors in the original poster's approach, but no consensus has been reached on the correct method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves assumptions about energy conservation and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy, with some expressing confusion about the results obtained.

enapper
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A roller coaster starts at height (h). It goes down this hill and then goes up a second hill that is at a height of 28.5 m at a speed of 15.8 m/s. How high was the initial hill?


Given equations:
U=mgh
KE=1/2mv^2
W=Fd
P=W/T



Honestly, we've never done a problem like this before and I'm unsure how to solve it. I know potential energy is at it's highest point at the peak of the first hill and that energy is always conserved, so I said mgh(1)-1/2mv^2(1)=mgh(2)-1/2mv^2, but I didn't get a logical answer. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi enapper! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)

your formula should work …

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong :smile:
 
Thanks!

mgh=mgh(2)-1/2mv^2(2)

I canceled out the mass because it should be the same throughout the equation and no mass is given, leaving me with:
gh=gh(sub2)-1/2v^2(sub2)

(9.8)(h)=(9.8)(28.5)-(1/2)(15.8)^2

9.8h=279.3-124.82

h=154.48/9.8

h=15.76

This answer seems illogical, though, because normally the cart would not be able to exceed the initial height, and the second hill is much higher than 15.76m.
 
oh, on second thoughts your formula was wrong …

it should have a + not a - …

conservation of energy is KE + PE = constant :wink:
 
That makes sense. "The whole is equal to the sum of the parts" sort of thing.
Thanks a million!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K