Energy Approximation for Small Velocity - Schutz's "A First Course in GR

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy approximation for small velocities as presented in Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity." The equation E = po = m(1-v²)^(1/2) approximates to E ≈ m + (1/2)mv² for small v. The derivation of the right-hand side from the left-hand side is clarified as a Taylor expansion around v=0, where higher-order terms are negligible due to the smallness of v.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series expansions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of energy in relativistic physics
  • Basic knowledge of General Relativity principles
  • Mathematical proficiency in handling algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Taylor series and their applications in physics
  • Explore the implications of small velocity approximations in General Relativity
  • Review Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity" for deeper insights
  • Investigate other energy approximations in relativistic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying General Relativity, educators teaching relativistic concepts, and researchers interested in energy approximations at small velocities.

mess1n
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
In the Schutz book, "A First Course in General Relativity" (bottom of p.42 if you have it), it states the following:

For small v, the energy is:

E = po = m(1-v2)-(1/2) =(approx) m + (1/2)mv2

I can't figure out why this is! For small v, the LHS will tend to m, and the RHS will tend to m, so it's a valid relation. But how did they derive the RHS from the LHS?

Any help would be appreciated. Let me know if you need some more info.

Cheers,
Andrew
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mess1n said:
In the Schutz book, "A First Course in General Relativity" (bottom of p.42 if you have it), it states the following:

For small v, the energy is:

E = po = m(1-v2)-(1/2) =(approx) m + (1/2)mv2

I can't figure out why this is! For small v, the LHS will tend to m, and the RHS will tend to m, so it's a valid relation. But how did they derive the RHS from the LHS?

Any help would be appreciated. Let me know if you need some more info.

Cheers,
Andrew

The right hand side is the Taylor expansion about v=0 of the left hand side. They stop the Taylor expansion at the second term because v is so small that third order and higher terms will be negligible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K