Energy conservation problem (need closure)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass sliding along a looped track, requiring it to remain on the track at all times, particularly at the top of the loop. The original poster seeks to determine the minimum release height and the normal forces at various points along the track.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply energy conservation principles to find the minimum height for the mass to remain on the track. Questions arise regarding the relevance of the release height and the calculations for normal forces at different points. Some participants suggest using net force equations and energy conservation to derive expressions for velocity and normal force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and corrections. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the relationship between energy conservation and the forces acting on the mass. Multiple interpretations of the equations and their implications are being explored, with some participants providing guidance on how to approach the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of energy conservation and the setup of the equations for normal force. The original poster's attempts to relate the release height to the forces acting on the mass are under discussion, with some participants noting potential errors in the calculations.

qswdefrg
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the small mass m sliding without friction along the looped track is to remain on the track at all times, even at the very top of the loop of radius r.
a) calculate, in terms of the given quantities, the min. release height h.

if actual release height is 2h, calculate
b) normal force exerted by track at bottom of loop
c) normal force exerted by track at top of loop
d) normal force exerted by track after block exits loop onto flat section

Homework Equations



Ek = 0.5mv^2
Eg = mgh
Fc = mv^2/r


The Attempt at a Solution



a) total energy = mgh
mass must remain on track at top of loop, so

mgh = 0.5mv^2 + mg(2r)
h = 2.5r

b) Does the release height matter? Because if mass does not accelerate up nor down, then Fn =mg? Is this the same for d)?

c) Centripetal force keeps mass moving
Fn = mv^2/r - mg
Fn = m(v^2/r - mg)

I'm not sure if this is right either.

any pointers/hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tiny-tim said:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

the mass will maintain contact with the track only if the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=73" is non-zero

find that reaction force by using Ftotal = ma, with a being the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=27"

start again! :smile:


at the top of the loop

Fnet = FN - Fg = ma

FN = mv2/r + mg

FN = m(v2/r + g)

this is similar to the answer I had before. I realize now that I hadn't used the 2h at all. Am I supposed to use energy conservation to figure this out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

yes, use conservation of energy to find what v is

(but your equation is wrong … a is in the same direction as g … anyway, how else would you get FN = 0?)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

yes, use conservation of energy to find what v is

(but your equation is wrong … a is in the same direction as g … anyway, how else would you get FN = 0?)

I got v2= g(2h-r)

So is the equation is Fn+Fg=ma?

Sub in velocity and I get Fn=2mg[(h/r)-1]. Is this correct?
 
Never mind my previous post; I think I've got it now.

at the top:

v2= 4g(r-h)

Fnet=Fc=Fn+Fg
Fn=mv2/r - mg
sub in v2
Fn= {[4mg(r-h)]/r } - mg

at the bottom:

v2= 4gh

Fnet=Fc=Fn-Fg
Fn=mv2/r + mg
Fn= (4mgh/r) + mg

at the end:

Fn= mg

:confused: *fingers crossed*
 
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

(b) and (c) look fine :smile:

(though you haven't finally converted h into 2.5r, and it would be easier to check if you put all the stages in)

but shouldn't this be 4g(h-r) ? :wink:
qswdefrg said:
v2= 4g(r-h)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

(b) and (c) look fine :smile:

(though you haven't finally converted h into 2.5r, and it would be easier to check if you put all the stages in)

but shouldn't this be 4g(h-r) ? :wink:


Yes the h and r should be switched; silly error my bad.

finding h in part a):

mgh = 0.5mv2 + mg2r
at the top min. speed is sqrt rg
mgh = 0.5mrg + mg2r
simplify
h = 2.5r

thanks so much for your help. i (finally!) got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K