Energy Efficiency Tips for Homeowners

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of active cesium nuclei in an 800-gram fish caught near the Fukushima nuclear power plant, which contains 7.4 megabecquerels of radioactive cesium-137. It highlights that the equation for activity (A(t)) is not suitable for this specific question without proper adjustments for elapsed time. The half-life of cesium-137 is approximately 30 years, but the calculations mistakenly assume a decay period of one year, which is inappropriate since the fish would spoil by then. Additionally, there is a mismatch in units, as the half-life in years was incorrectly applied in an equation where activity is measured in disintegrations per second. Accurate calculations require consistent units and appropriate time frames.
tomcajot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Near the Fukushíma nuclear power plant, a fish was caught with a record amount of radioactive 137-Cs of 7.4 megabecquerels per kilogram. Calculate the number of active cesium nuclei in an 800 gram fish.
Relevant Equations
(Don't know how to add LaTeX, the relevant equations will be in the picture in the solution attempt)
Screenshot 2021-12-08 at 17.34.30.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomcajot said:
Homework Statement:: Near the Fukushíma nuclear power plant, a fish was caught with a record amount of radioactive 137-Cs of 7.4 megabecquerels per kilogram. Calculate the number of active cesium nuclei in an 800 gram fish.
Relevant Equations:: (Don't know how to add LaTeX, the relevant equations will be in the picture in the solution attempt)

View attachment 293787
Hi @tomcajot and welcome to PF.

Here are some points to consider…

Your equation for A(t) is used to find the activity after a given time (t) has elapsed. This isn’t really appropriate in this question (Though the equation can be used if you realize what value to use for elapsed time.)

You have used ‘30’ as the half-life of Cs-137. This is the approximate half-life of Cs-137 in years, Your working implies that you have take t=1 year – i.e. you have assumed the sample has been decaying for 1 year. (The fish will have gone off by then.)

You have also used the half-life in years in an equation where the activity is in Bq (disintegrations per second). So you have a problem with mismatched units.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
971
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K