Energy Eigenstates and Degeneracy: Proving Non-Commuting Observables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that energy eigenstates corresponding to two non-commuting observables, A_1 and A_2, which commute with the Hamiltonian, are generally degenerate. The mathematical framework involves the commutation relations \([A_1, A_2] \neq 0\) and \([A_1, H] = [A_2, H] = 0\). An example provided is the central-force problem where \(H = \frac{\textbf{p}^2}{2m} + V(r)\), with \(A_1\) as \(L_z\) and \(A_2\) as \(L_x\). The conclusion drawn is that while the eigenstates are typically degenerate, the discussion raises the question of potential exceptions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically operators and observables.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and eigenvalue problems.
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum theory.
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum operators, such as \(L_z\) and \(L_x\).
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of non-commuting observables in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the conditions under which energy eigenstates may be non-degenerate.
  • Investigate specific examples of Hamiltonians with degenerate eigenstates.
  • Learn about the role of symmetry in quantum systems and its effect on degeneracy.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying operator theory, and anyone interested in the properties of energy eigenstates and their degeneracy in quantum systems.

Bill Foster
Messages
334
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two observables A_1 and A_2, which do not involve time explicitly, are known not to commute,

\left[A_1,A_2\right]\ne 0

Yet they both commute with the Hamiltonian:

\left[A_1,H\right]=0
\left[A_2,H\right]=0

Prove that they energy eigenstates are, in general, degenerate.

Are there exceptions?

As an example, you may think of the central-force problem H=\frac{\textbf{p}^2}{2m}+V\left(r\right) with A_1 \rightarrow L_z, A_2 \rightarrow L_x

The Attempt at a Solution



If the Hamiltonian operates on the ket, we get:

H|n\rangle = E_n|n\rangle

If the A_n operates operate on the ket:

A_n|n\rangle = a_n|n\rangle

If the Hamiltonian operates on that:

H\left(A_n|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_n|n\rangle\right)

So:

H\left(A_1|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_1|n\rangle\right)
H\left(A_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2|n\rangle\right)

These are non-degenerate, because a_1\ne a_2

Given this:

\left[A_1,A_2\right]\ne 0

That means A_1A_2-A_2A_1\ne 0

Which means A_1A_2 \ne A_2A_1

But

A_1A_2|n\rangle = a_1a_2|n\rangle

And

A_2A_1|n\rangle = a_2a_1|n\rangle

However: a_1a_2=a_2a_1, so

a_1a_2|n\rangle = a_2a_1|n\rangle

But

A_1A_2|n\rangle \ne A_2A_1|n\rangle

Now

H\left(A_1A_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_1a_2|n\rangle\right)

And

H\left(A_2A_1|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2a_1|n\rangle\right)

So

E_n\left(a_1a_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2a_1|n\rangle\right)

And therefore they are degenerate.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
But I'm not really sure how to find an exception.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K