Energy-momentum conservation equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy-momentum conservation equation in the context of general relativity, specifically using the metric ds^2=-e^{2\Phi}dt^2+e^{2\Lambda}dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2. The energy-momentum tensor is defined as t^{ab}=(\rho+p)u^au^b+pg^{ab}, where the 4-velocity is u=e^{-\Phi}\partial_t. The conservation equation \nabla_aT^{ab}=0 is shown to be equivalent to the relation (\rho+p)\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=-\frac{dp}{dr}. The user initially struggled with the complexity of the equations but successfully derived the result by focusing on the r equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, particularly energy-momentum tensors.
  • Familiarity with metric tensors and their implications in spacetime geometry.
  • Knowledge of connection coefficients and their role in covariant differentiation.
  • Basic proficiency in differential equations as applied in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy-momentum tensor in general relativity.
  • Learn about covariant differentiation and its applications in general relativity.
  • Explore the implications of the conservation equation \nabla_aT^{ab}=0 in various physical scenarios.
  • Investigate simplifications in complex tensor equations to streamline calculations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in general relativity, as well as students and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of energy-momentum conservation in curved spacetime.

cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Messages
8,144
Reaction score
75
We have the metric ds^2=-e^{2\Phi}dt^2+e^{2\Lambda}dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2, and the energy momentum tensor takes the form t^{ab}=(\rho+p)u^au^b+pg^{ab} where the 4-velocity is u=e^{-\Phi}\partial_t, and \Phi and \Lambda are functions of r only.

I'm asked to show that the ebergy-momentum conservation equation \nabla_aT^{ab}=0 is equivalent to (\rho+p)\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=-\frac{dp}{dr}.

Now, I'm after some advice on how to calculate this. I know all the connection coefficients (they were given in the question). I tried setting up the four equations, one for each value of b, and then attempting to solve these, but each of these equations has 12 terms in, so I figured there must be an easier way to do this!

Does anyone know whether there is another way, or if there are any simplifications I can make; or do I need to plough through the 4 equations?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I've got the answer. Just decided to compute the r equation, and it gave the result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K