Energy-momentum tensor for electromagnetism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the energy-momentum tensor for electromagnetism from a given Lagrangian. The subject area includes classical electrodynamics and field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the equivalence of terms in the energy-momentum tensor derivation and seeks clarification on specific components. Other participants reference advanced concepts from Noether's theorem and the Belinfante symmetrization procedure, indicating a deeper theoretical context.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided references to textbooks and resources that may aid in understanding the concepts involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the Lagrangian and the energy-momentum tensor, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the absence of gravity and its implications for the derivation, as well as the need for further resources to clarify advanced topics in the discussion.

nikhilb1997
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive
Tμν=FμλFνλ-1/4ημνFλθFλθ
From
\mathcal{L}=1/4F_{μν}F^{μν}+A_μJ^μ

Homework Equations



Above

3. The Attempt at a Solution
The first term of the given equation and the second term of the equation to prove are i believe the same.i know, Jμ=\partial_νF^{μν}
But I need an explanation for the equivalence of the remaining term.
Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. In the absence of gravity T follows from L from the Noether theorem and the Belinfante symmetrization procedure.

2. In the presence of gravity T follows from L directly (even without the coupling to charged scalar matter).

Both parts are (advanced) textbook stuff in either of the 3 subjects: classical electrodynamics or classical/quantum field theory (1.), general relativity (2.)

Was this helpful for you ? Either 1. or 2. should give you a starting point.
 
dextercioby said:
1. In the absence of gravity T follows from L from the Noether theorem and the Belinfante symmetrization procedure.

2. In the presence of gravity T follows from L directly (even without the coupling to charged scalar matter).

Both parts are (advanced) textbook stuff in either of the 3 subjects: classical electrodynamics or classical/quantum field theory (1.), general relativity (2.)

Was this helpful for you ? Either 1. or 2. should give you a starting point.
Thanks but can you suggest a book or something where i can understand this better, a good explanatory text perhaps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K