Energy- momentum tensor of photon fluid/EM- field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the stress-energy-momentum tensor (SET) of a photon fluid and that of an electromagnetic (EM) field. It establishes that the photon fluid, characterized by the equation of state P=ρ/3, can be represented as a perfect fluid, while the SET of incoherent radiation differs from that of an EM plane wave. The EM plane wave's SET is defined as Tmn = σKaKb, where Km is a null propagation vector. Additionally, the electro-vacuum solutions exhibit a diagonal Einstein tensor, closely resembling a perfect fluid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress-energy-momentum tensors in general relativity
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field theory
  • Knowledge of the equation of state for perfect fluids
  • Basic concepts of cosmology and photon fluids
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the stress-energy tensor for electromagnetic fields
  • Explore the implications of the equation of state P=ρ/3 in cosmological models
  • Investigate the differences between coherent and incoherent radiation in terms of SET
  • Review the electro-vacuum solutions and their applications in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and researchers in theoretical physics who are exploring the dynamics of photon fluids and electromagnetic fields in the context of general relativity.

Lurian
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey!

In cosmology the notion of a photon fluid is often used, i.e. a perfect fluid with the equation of state P=\frac{\rho}{3} and the stress-energy- momentum tensor of a perfect fluid. On the other hand, a photon fluid is just an electromagnetic field with the well- known definition for its stress- energy- momentum tensor. Where is the connection between those tensors? Is the fluid's stress- energy tensor just the diagonalized version of the EM- stress- energy tensor? Or is the connection between these tensors not so obvious?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The SET of incoherent radiation, and of an EM plane wave are different from each other and the SET of an electromagnetic field. Photons don't carry charge so the SET of an electric field/magnetic field is not relevant to the photons ( EM radiation) case.

An EM plane wave has the SET Tmn = σKaKb where Km is a null propagation vector giving the direction of the plane wave. The SET of incoherent radiation is not diagonal, see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_dust_solution.

The electro-vacuum solutions have a diagonal Einstein tensor so that's the closest to a perfect fluid of them. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrovacuum_solution.
 
Last edited:
Example 3 in section 8.1 may be helpful: http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch08/ch08.html#Section8.1 The formatting of the matrices is messed up in the html version, so use the pdf.

The x-t components of the stress-energy tensor flip their signs under a parity inversion, so they have to vanish for an isotropic photon gas. They don't vanish for a wave propagating in a certain direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
978