Energy of an Object Falling Through the Earth (yes, all the way through)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the gravitational potential energy of an object falling through a hypothetical hole drilled through the Earth. The correct expressions for the kinetic energy of the object as it passes through the Earth's center are identified as 1/2 mgR and GmM/2R. The participants clarify the relationship between gravitational force and potential energy, emphasizing that the gravitational force inside a homogeneous sphere is proportional to the distance from the center, leading to the derived potential energy equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (Ug = GmM/R)
  • Knowledge of gravitational force inside a sphere (F = -GMm/R^3 * r)
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts, particularly integration
  • Concept of conservative forces and work-energy principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational potential energy in spherical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of the shell theorem in gravitational physics
  • Explore advanced integration techniques for calculating work done by variable forces
  • Investigate the concept of gravitational fields and their applications in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators preparing for AP tests, and anyone interested in gravitational theory and energy dynamics.

Brilliant
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
This is from an old AP test, and it's a multiple choice question, so I don't know why it's giving me so much hell, but here it goes:

Homework Statement


Suppose that a hole is drilled through the center of the Earth to the other side along its axis. A small object of mass m is dropped from rest into the hole at the surface of Earth, as shown [strike]above[/strike]below. If Earth is assumed to be a solid sphere of mass M and radius R and friction is assumed to be negligible, correct expressions for the kinetic energy of the mass as it passes Earth's center include which of the following?
[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4439149/physucks_mc_hole_through_earth.jpg
The two correct expressions are
\frac {1}{2}mgR
and
\frac {GmM}{2R}

Homework Equations


Ug=GmM/R

PS sorry the image is sideways.

The Attempt at a Solution


My first through was just the typical: initial potential equals final kinetic. That means that
GmM/R would be a proper expression of the kinetic energy, but that is not a correct answer.

I got to thinking, I bet the object still has some of its potential energy at the center. So I basically just considered all of the mass to be a distance of 1/2R away, the direction didn't matter since energy is scalar. That yields 2GmM/R, which is more than the original potential.

Then I started thinking, why does the specific Ug at the surface increase as h increases, in mgh, but Ug decreases as R increases when looking at the universal law. Then I realized I had severely confused myself over a multiple choice problem that is probably very simple.

Please help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks strange, but the potential energy is not zero in the centre of Earth. It is chosen zero at infinity, and it is U(R)=-GmM/R at the surface of Earth.
To get the potential energy in the centre U(0), you have to go back to the definition of the potential: -grad U = F.

Assuming homogeneous mass distribution inside the Earth, the force is proportional to the distance from the centre:

F=-\frac{GMm}{R^3}r

To get the potential difference between the centre and the surface of Earth, you have to integrate -F.

U(R)-U(0)=-\int_0^R{Fdr}=\int_0^R{\frac{GMm}{R^3}rdr}=\frac{GMm}{R^3}R^2/2

\rightarrow U(R)-U(0)=\frac{GMm}{2R} \rightarrow U(0)=-\frac{3}{2} \frac{GMm}{R}

ehild
 
Last edited:
OK starting to understand, but there is something I'm missing. I don't understand what grad U = F means, and also where the R cubed came from. I think the two are probably related.

Maybe something with Fxr = -U? But I still don't see where R cubed will come from. Probably some calculus?

I understand everything you did after that, just now how you decided that
<br /> F=-\frac{GMm}{R^3}r<br />

Thanks, I really appreciate the help!
 
You probably learned how the potential is related to work. If a force is conservative, the work of this force when a body moves from point A to B, is independent on the path which connect these points. For a conservative force, the work is equal to the negative potential difference: W(A,B)=U(A)-(U(B). The place where the potential is zero can be chosen arbitrarily, but in the case of gravity we chose the zero point of the potential energy at infinity.

The definition of the potential energy at a point A is the work done by the force on a body when it moves from A to the place of zero potential (to infinity, in case of gravity).

The force can vary with position. If this is the case, the work is calculated by integrating the force with respect the displacement,

W(A,B)=\int_A^B{\vec Fd\vec r}

and the potential is defined at point A with the integral:

U(A)=\int_A ^{\infty} {\vec F d\vec r}

The gravitational force of a homogeneous sphere of mass M and radius R, at a distance r from is centre is -GMm/r^, as if the whole mass M were concentrated at the centre of the sphere. (The - sign shows that the force points inward.) This is valid when r is greater or equal to the radius of the sphere. If a body is inside this big sphere, only that amount of mass counts which is enclosed inside the sphere of radius r. This can be proved but requires some amount of integration.

If the sphere is homogeneous, the volume of the inner sphere of radius r is V(r) =4/3 r^3 pi, while the volume of the whole sphere is V(R)= 4/3 R^3 pi. The mass of the spheres is proportional to the volume: so the mass of the inner sphere is

\frac {m_{sph}}{M}= \frac{r^3}{R^3}It is still valid that the force of gravity is the same as if all the mass were concentrated at the centre, but this mass is msph now:

m_{sph}= \frac{r^3}{R^3}M

F= -G\frac{m_{sph}m}{r^2}=-GM\frac{r^3}{R^3}{r^2}=-\frac{GM}{R^3}r
ehild
 
Wow

I see the light, though I feel like I should already know this. And you're ignoring the shell of mass that has a radius grater than the falling objects radius as it falls, and only using the sphere on which it sits, basically. I guess all of the mass in the outer shell exerts a net force of 0. That makes sense, I can see it conceptually.

Thanks so much for explaining it all, however, I still don't see how that can be solved in 80 seconds. I guess maybe if you know all this you could eliminate answers.

Anyway, Thanks!
 
Brilliant said:
Thanks so much for explaining it all, however, I still don't see how that can be solved in 80 seconds. I guess maybe if you know all this you could eliminate answers.

Anyway, Thanks!

These are basic things, usually explained during classes.

ehild
 
Well, we have learned all of the concepts, it's just I was having trouble putting all that together. And it seems a bit more in-depth than most other multiple choice problems.

I appreciate the help though.
 
Well, these are not easy to understand, although the formulae are easy to remember. I would not include such question among multiple choice problems.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K