Energy of Conservation Lab Report Question

In summary, the conversation discusses an experiment where a cart is tied to a hanging mass and its velocity is measured as it passes through a gate. The potential and kinetic energy of the hanging mass is calculated and it is found that energy was lost. The group discusses where the lost energy could have gone and concludes that it went into moving the cart as well. The total energy is conserved in this process.
  • #1
jdawg
367
2

Homework Statement



In this experiment we tied a cart to a hanging mass and measured the velocity as it passed through a gate, and recorded the mass of the cart. I calculated the potential and kinetic energy of the hanging mass and when I subtracted the potential from the kinetic, I got a negative number. Does this mean that energy was lost? Do these results make sense? Please let me know if I wasn't descriptive enough of the scenario!


Homework Equations


K=(1/2)mv2
U=mgh
K-U


The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what I did for trial 1 (all of the units are what they need to be for the formula to work):

Calculating Kinetic Energy:
K=(1/2)(0.075)(1.23)2=0.0567 J

Calculating Potential Energy:
U=(0.075)(9.8)(0.86) =0.6321

The difference:
0.0567-0.6321= -0.575
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes energy was lost but check your numbers again because a lot of energy was lost, more than one would expect. Where did the lost energy go?
 
  • #3
I'm not really sure what I'm doing wrong! All the numbers are what I recorded during the lab, the units are right, the equations are right... I don't know, I thought the purpose of this experiment was to show how potential energy could be converted into kinetic energy. So should I have not lost any energy?
 
  • #4
Follow the energy transformations - you are converting gravitational potential energy in the hanging mass into kinetic energy in what?
 
  • #5
jdawg said:
I'm not really sure what I'm doing wrong! All the numbers are what I recorded during the lab, the units are right, the equations are right... I don't know, I thought the purpose of this experiment was to show how potential energy could be converted into kinetic energy. So should I have not lost any energy?
some energy is lost ...depends on the smoothness of the spinning pulley and cart wheels... But not all that much...what did you measure for the cart mass and what was the value of the hanging mass ?
 
  • #6
jdawg reports:
I calculated the potential and kinetic energy of the hanging mass and when I subtracted the potential from the kinetic, I got a negative number.
... taken as written, the change in PE of the hanging mass was subtracted from the change in KE of the hanging mass. This should be a negative number since the PE of the hanging mass went to do more than just accelerate the hanging mass.

There is another very important place the energy went - and a bunch of other places that probably have a smaller, but also important, effect.

I'd like to see jdawg work through the places the PE could have gone before providing further help.
 
  • #7
PhanthomJay said:
some energy is lost ...depends on the smoothness of the spinning pulley and cart wheels... But not all that much...what did you measure for the cart mass and what was the value of the hanging mass ?

The mass of the cart was 0.5246 kg and the mass of the hanging weight for trial 1 was 0.075 kg

Ooops... Was I supposed to use the mass of the cart?
 
  • #8
jdawg said:
The mass of the cart was 0.5246 kg and the mass of the hanging weight for trial 1 was 0.075 kg

Ooops... Was I supposed to use the mass of the cart?
That's what I figured happened :) It is total energy that is conserved.

The energy transformation goes like this:
The PE lost by the weight goes to KE in everything that moves as a result.
So the weight moves, but it also moves the cart. (re. post #6)

Add the KE of the cart to the KE of the weight, compare with the PE.
 
  • #9
Simon Bridge said:
That's what I figured happened :) It is total energy that is conserved.

The energy transformation goes like this:
The PE lost by the weight goes to KE in everything that moves as a result.
So the weight moves, but it also moves the cart. (re. post #6)

Add the KE of the cart to the KE of the weight, compare with the PE.

Haha ohh! Thanks so much! :)
 

FAQ: Energy of Conservation Lab Report Question

1. What is the purpose of a Energy of Conservation Lab Report?

The purpose of an Energy of Conservation Lab Report is to analyze and document the energy transformations and conservation principles observed during an experiment. This report helps to validate the law of conservation of energy and provides a detailed record of the measurements and calculations performed.

2. How is energy conserved in a closed system?

In a closed system, energy is conserved because it cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This means that the total amount of energy within the system remains constant. This principle is known as the law of conservation of energy and is a fundamental concept in physics.

3. What are some examples of energy transformations in a closed system?

Some examples of energy transformations in a closed system include the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy, the conversion of electrical energy into light energy, and the conversion of chemical energy into thermal energy.

4. How do you calculate the efficiency of an energy transformation?

The efficiency of an energy transformation is calculated by dividing the useful output energy by the total input energy and multiplying by 100%. This gives a percentage value that represents how much of the input energy was converted into useful output energy.

5. What are the limitations of the law of conservation of energy?

The law of conservation of energy has some limitations, such as not being applicable to systems that are not closed or isolated. It also does not take into account any energy losses due to friction, heat, or other external factors. Additionally, it does not account for potential energy changes due to changes in the Earth's gravitational field.

Back
Top