Energy of Conservation Lab Report Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment involving a cart tied to a hanging mass, where participants analyze the potential and kinetic energy measurements taken during the experiment. The original poster expresses confusion over obtaining a negative value when subtracting potential energy from kinetic energy, questioning whether this indicates energy loss and if the results are reasonable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations of kinetic and potential energy, with some questioning the accuracy of the recorded values and the implications of energy loss. There are inquiries about where the energy might have gone and the role of the cart's mass in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on considering the total energy transformation involved in the experiment, suggesting that the potential energy lost by the hanging mass is converted into kinetic energy of both the cart and the hanging mass. There is an ongoing exploration of the factors affecting energy loss, such as the smoothness of the pulley and cart wheels.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using the correct mass values in calculations and the potential for energy loss due to various factors in the experimental setup. The original poster's understanding of energy conservation principles is also under examination.

jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



In this experiment we tied a cart to a hanging mass and measured the velocity as it passed through a gate, and recorded the mass of the cart. I calculated the potential and kinetic energy of the hanging mass and when I subtracted the potential from the kinetic, I got a negative number. Does this mean that energy was lost? Do these results make sense? Please let me know if I wasn't descriptive enough of the scenario!


Homework Equations


K=(1/2)mv2
U=mgh
K-U


The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what I did for trial 1 (all of the units are what they need to be for the formula to work):

Calculating Kinetic Energy:
K=(1/2)(0.075)(1.23)2=0.0567 J

Calculating Potential Energy:
U=(0.075)(9.8)(0.86) =0.6321

The difference:
0.0567-0.6321= -0.575
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes energy was lost but check your numbers again because a lot of energy was lost, more than one would expect. Where did the lost energy go?
 
I'm not really sure what I'm doing wrong! All the numbers are what I recorded during the lab, the units are right, the equations are right... I don't know, I thought the purpose of this experiment was to show how potential energy could be converted into kinetic energy. So should I have not lost any energy?
 
Follow the energy transformations - you are converting gravitational potential energy in the hanging mass into kinetic energy in what?
 
jdawg said:
I'm not really sure what I'm doing wrong! All the numbers are what I recorded during the lab, the units are right, the equations are right... I don't know, I thought the purpose of this experiment was to show how potential energy could be converted into kinetic energy. So should I have not lost any energy?
some energy is lost ...depends on the smoothness of the spinning pulley and cart wheels... But not all that much...what did you measure for the cart mass and what was the value of the hanging mass ?
 
jdawg reports:
I calculated the potential and kinetic energy of the hanging mass and when I subtracted the potential from the kinetic, I got a negative number.
... taken as written, the change in PE of the hanging mass was subtracted from the change in KE of the hanging mass. This should be a negative number since the PE of the hanging mass went to do more than just accelerate the hanging mass.

There is another very important place the energy went - and a bunch of other places that probably have a smaller, but also important, effect.

I'd like to see jdawg work through the places the PE could have gone before providing further help.
 
PhanthomJay said:
some energy is lost ...depends on the smoothness of the spinning pulley and cart wheels... But not all that much...what did you measure for the cart mass and what was the value of the hanging mass ?

The mass of the cart was 0.5246 kg and the mass of the hanging weight for trial 1 was 0.075 kg

Ooops... Was I supposed to use the mass of the cart?
 
jdawg said:
The mass of the cart was 0.5246 kg and the mass of the hanging weight for trial 1 was 0.075 kg

Ooops... Was I supposed to use the mass of the cart?
That's what I figured happened :) It is total energy that is conserved.

The energy transformation goes like this:
The PE lost by the weight goes to KE in everything that moves as a result.
So the weight moves, but it also moves the cart. (re. post #6)

Add the KE of the cart to the KE of the weight, compare with the PE.
 
Simon Bridge said:
That's what I figured happened :) It is total energy that is conserved.

The energy transformation goes like this:
The PE lost by the weight goes to KE in everything that moves as a result.
So the weight moves, but it also moves the cart. (re. post #6)

Add the KE of the cart to the KE of the weight, compare with the PE.

Haha ohh! Thanks so much! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K