Energy released through alpha decay

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the alpha decay of radon-222 (Rn-222), which emits an alpha particle and transforms into polonium (Po). The atomic masses are specified as Rn-222: 222.0157 u, Po: 218.00896 u, and He: 4.00260 u. The total energy released during three half-lives (3 T1/2) is calculated to be approximately 1.013 x 108 MeV, derived from the energy released per decay of Rn-222, which is 3.86 MeV, multiplied by the number of decayed nuclei. The calculations emphasize the importance of understanding half-life and the relationship between the number of decayed nuclei and energy release.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with atomic mass units (u) and energy calculations in MeV
  • Knowledge of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence principle (E=mc2)
  • Basic proficiency in logarithmic functions for calculating half-lives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of radioactive decay and half-life calculations
  • Learn about the mass-energy equivalence and its applications in nuclear physics
  • Explore the concept of alpha decay and its implications in nuclear reactions
  • Investigate the use of decay chains and their impact on energy release in nuclear processes
USEFUL FOR

Students in nuclear physics, educators teaching radioactive decay, and researchers interested in the energy dynamics of alpha decay processes.

songoku
Messages
2,508
Reaction score
402

Homework Statement


The radioactive isotope radon-222 may decay spontaneously by emitting an alpha particle. The daughter nucleus is an isotope of polonium. The atomic masses of these isotopes are:
Rn-222 : 222.0157 u
Po : 218.00896 u
He : 4.00260 u

A sample of radon-222 contains 3.0 x 107 nuclei. The total energy that will be release in a time interval of 3 T1/2 through alpha decay of the radon-222 is:
a. 3.856 MeV
b. 5.785 x 107 MeV
c. 8.677 x 107 MeV
d. 1.012 x 108 MeV
e. 1.085 x 108 MeV

Homework Equations


E = mc^2
T1/2 = (ln 2) / λ

The Attempt at a Solution


If the question asks only for one half-life then the energy released = (mass of Rn - mass of Po - mass of He) x 931.5 MeV. Is this correct?

I don't know how the time interval of 3 half-life and number of nuclei play part in this question. Are they used to find energy released or they are only redundant information?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:

Homework Statement


The radioactive isotope radon-222 may decay spontaneously by emitting an alpha particle. The daughter nucleus is an isotope of polonium. The atomic masses of these isotopes are:
Rn-222 : 222.0157 u
Po : 218.00896 u
He : 4.00260 u

A sample of radon-222 contains 3.0 x 107 nuclei. The total energy that will be release in a time interval of 3 T1/2 through alpha decay of the radon-222 is:
a. 3.856 MeV
b. 5.785 x 107 MeV
c. 8.677 x 107 MeV
d. 1.012 x 108 MeV
e. 1.085 x 108 MeV

Homework Equations


E = mc^2
T1/2 = (ln 2) / λ

The Attempt at a Solution


If the question asks only for one half-life then the energy released = (mass of Rn - mass of Po - mass of He) x 931.5 MeV. Is this correct?

I don't know how the time interval of 3 half-life and number of nuclei play part in this question. Are they used to find energy released or they are only redundant information?

Thanks
What happens during a half life?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
PeroK said:
What happens during a half life?
Radon decays so the number of nuclei becomes half of original. The mass will also becomes 111.00785 u? The mass of He will stay the same as before?
How about mass of Po?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Radon decays so the number of nuclei becomes half of original. The mass will also becomes 111.00785 u? The mass of He will stay the same as before?
How about mass of Po?

Thanks

In one half life half of the original nuclei decay. So, what about after three half lives.

The atomic masses of the isotopes don't change!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
PeroK said:
In one half life half of the original nuclei decay. So, what about after three half lives.
The nuclei of radon will be 3/8 × 107

The atomic masses of the isotopes don't change!
You mean the mass of radon will still be 222.0157 u? Does decay also change the mass of the nuclei?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
The nuclei of radon will be 3/8 × 107You mean the mass of radon will still be 222.0157 u? Does decay also change the mass of the nuclei?

Thanks

I would have said: after three half lives 7/8 of the original nuclei will have decayed.

The Radon nuclei are decaying into different nuclei, so the original nuclei are either gone or still the same.

That doesn't seem like a particularly difficult concept!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
PeroK said:
I would have said: after three half lives 7/8 of the original nuclei will have decayed.

So the number of nuclei, mass, activity will be 1/8 of original?

The Radon nuclei are decaying into different nuclei, so the original nuclei are either gone or still the same.
One simple basic question:
radon decays into Po by emitting alpha. Let say the number of nuclei of radon is x initially. After 1 half life, the number of nuclei of radon is 1/2 x and Po is 1/2 x. After 2 half life, radon is 1/4 x and Po is 3/4 x. Is this correct?
The particle "lost" by radon becomes Po? Alpha particle not taking some of particle "lost" by radon?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
After 2 half life, radon is 1/4 x and Po is 3/4 x. Is this correct?
Yes.
songoku said:
The particle "lost" by radon becomes Po? Alpha particle not taking some of particle "lost" by radon?
I do not understand your terminology. The number of particles of radon lost equals the number of particles of Po created and equals the number of He particles created (ignoring the decay of Po).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
I do not understand your terminology. The number of particles of radon lost equals the number of particles of Po created and equals the number of He particles created (ignoring the decay of Po).
I am not sure I get what you mean. If the particles lost by radon = Po + He created, does it mean after two half life, radon will be 1/4 x but Po is not 3/4 x (Po will be y and He will be z where y + z = 3/4 x)?
 
  • #10
songoku said:
I am not sure I get what you mean. If the particles lost by radon = Po + He created, does it mean after two half life, radon will be 1/4 x but Po is not 3/4 x (Po will be y and He will be z where y + z = 3/4 x)?
No. Radon decays into Polonium plus Helium.

You can see by the atomic masses than one Polonium plus one Helium almost adds up to one Radon.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #11
PeroK said:
Radon decays into Polonium plus Helium plus an alpha particle.
No, the Helium nucleus is the alpha particle - same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and PeroK
  • #12
songoku said:
I am not sure I get what you mean. If the particles lost by radon = Po + He created, does it mean after two half life, radon will be 1/4 x but Po is not 3/4 x (Po will be y and He will be z where y + z = 3/4 x)?
No, I mean that each decaying Radon becomes one Po plus one He, the He being the alpha particle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #13
PeroK said:
No. Radon decays into Polonium plus Helium plus an alpha particle.

You can see by the atomic masses than one Polonium plus one Helium almost adds up to one Radon.

haruspex said:
No, I mean that each decaying Radon becomes one Po plus one He, the He being the alpha particle.

After 1 half life:
Radon = 3/2 × 107 nuclei
Mass of remaining radon = 3/2 × 107 x 222 x 10-3 / (6.02 x 1023) = 5.53 x 10-18 kg

Po = 3/2 × 107 nuclei
Mass of Po = 3/2 × 107 x 218 x 10-3 / (6.02 x 1023) = 5.43 x 10-18 kg

Mass of He = 4 x 1.66 x 10-27 = 6.68 x 10-27 kg

Energy released = (5.43 x 10-18 + 6.68 x 10-27 - 5.53 x 10-18) x (3 x 108)2 = 9 x 10-3 J = 5.625 x 1010 MeV

and it is wrong...:confused:
 
  • #14
songoku said:
After 1 half life:
Radon = 3/2 × 107 nuclei
Mass of remaining radon = 3/2 × 107 x 222 x 10-3 / (6.02 x 1023) = 5.53 x 10-18 kg

Po = 3/2 × 107 nuclei
Mass of Po = 3/2 × 107 x 218 x 10-3 / (6.02 x 1023) = 5.43 x 10-18 kg

Mass of He = 4 x 1.66 x 10-27 = 6.68 x 10-27 kg

Energy released = (5.43 x 10-18 + 6.68 x 10-27 - 5.53 x 10-18) x (3 x 108)2 = 9 x 10-3 J = 5.625 x 1010 MeV

and it is wrong...:confused:

The question specifies 3 half lives. Also, why use kilograms and Joules? That's just making the calculations much more complicated.

Also, surely it's much simpler to calculate how much energy (in ##u## and ##MeV##) is released by one decaying Radon. Then work out how many Radon nuclei decay and multiply the two together.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #15
PeroK said:
The question specifies 3 half lives.
I mean my calculation for just 1 half life already wrong, not to mention it still needed to be added with 2 and 3 half life.

Also, why use kilograms and Joules? That's just making the calculations much more complicated.
Just habit to use SI unit

Also, surely it's much simpler to calculate how much energy (in ##u## and ##MeV##) is released by one decaying Radon. Then work out how many Radon nuclei decay and multiply the two together.
Energy released by one decaying Radon = (218.00896 u + 4.00260 u - 222.0157 u) x 931.5 MeV = 3.86 MeV

After three half lives 7/8 of the Radon will have decayed, so total energy released = 3.86 MeV x 7/8 x 3 x 107 = 1.013 x 108 MeV

Is this correct?

If the question asks for only 1 half life, instead of 7/8 I should use 1/2?

Thanks
 
  • #16
songoku said:
Energy released by one decaying Radon = (218.00896 u + 4.00260 u - 222.0157 u) x 931.5 MeV = 3.86 MeV

After three half lives 7/8 of the Radon will have decayed, so total energy released = 3.86 MeV x 7/8 x 3 x 107 = 1.013 x 108 MeV

Is this correct?

Yes.

songoku said:
If the question asks for only 1 half life, instead of 7/8 I should use 1/2?

Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #17
Thank you very much for the help Perok and haruspex
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K