Energy to lift a mass, voltage, amps, time, distance confuse

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of a small electric motor used to lift a mass through a distance of 1 meter. The original poster presents data for two different masses, including their respective voltage, current, and time taken for lifting, while questioning the relationship between the work done and the electrical energy supplied.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate useful work done using the formula mgh and electrical energy supplied using E = IVt. They express confusion over the significant difference between the work done and the energy supplied, questioning whether the motor provides excess energy that is lost as heat and noise.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the height used in calculations and the accuracy of the provided data.
  • Others suggest that the efficiency of small DC motors may explain the discrepancies observed in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations and expressing similar confusion regarding the results. Some have confirmed the correctness of the calculations while others have noted potential issues with the source material. The discussion remains open, with no consensus reached on the underlying cause of the discrepancies.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that this inquiry is not for homework but rather a personal investigation through a book that lacks answers for the section discussed. There is an acknowledgment of possible typos or errors in the book's data.

Barclay
Messages
207
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A student investigates the efficiency of a small electric motor. He uses a motor to lift it a mass through a constant distance of 1 m. He times how long it takes to lift the masses and makes a record of the potential difference and the current of the motor.

In the book that I am reading there is a table of values. I'll give you values for two of the masses:

Mass lifted = 0.01g; voltage of motor = 2.4V; current in motor = 0.20A; time to lift the mass = 22 seconds

Mass lifted = 0.03g; voltage of motor = 2.4V; current in motor = 0.22A; time to lift the mass = 24.4 seconds

Questions are:
(i) What is the useful work done in Joules
(ii) What is the electrical energy supplied?

Homework Equations


The book says useful work done = mgh

The book does not give a formula for electrical energy supplied but I think it is E = IVt

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
(i) For the 0.01g mass, useful work done= mgh = (0.01/1000) x 10 x 1 = 0.0001 JFor the 0.03g mass, useful work done= mgh = (0.03/1000) x 10 x 1 = 0.0003 J

(ii) For the 0.01g mass, electrical energy supplied E = IVt = 0.2 x 2.4 x 22 = 10.56 J

For the 0.03g mass, electrical energy supplied E = IVt = 0.22 x 2.4 x 24.4 = 12.88 JI think there is something wrong here. How can the work done to lift the 0.01g mass be 0.0001 J but the energy supplied be 10.56 J ? Such a large difference. Does the motor just provide too much energy for the task? Is the excess just lost as heat and noise?

The 0.01g is very low weight isn't it. May be the author meant 0.01 kg and that would give 0.1 J useful work done.

What's going on? Are my answers incorrect or is this the way its meant to be.

Please note that this is not homework. I'm just working through a book and there are no answers for this section. So please don't fear that you'll be "giving" me the answers for a homework. I'll be happy to accept straight explanations ... without riddles:smile::smile:

Yours gratefully

Barclay
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you know to use 1 meter for the h in your mgh calculation?
 
The book described the experiment as lifting the mass 1m

Barclay said:
He uses a motor to lift it a mass through a constant distance of 1 m
 
Last edited:
Barclay said:
That picture that pasted is an error. How do i remove it?
Edit your post, select "More Options". You should see a "Delete" option beside the thumbnail.
 
gneill said:
Edit your post, select "More Options". You should see a "Delete" option beside the thumbnail.

Thanks for that
 
All your working is correct.

Barclay said:
I think there is something wrong here. How can the work done to lift the 0.01g mass be 0.0001 J but the energy supplied be 10.56 J ? Such a large difference. Does the motor just provide too much energy for the task? Is the excess just lost as heat and noise?

For small DC motor motors the rule of thumb efficiency is often stated as 50% (ie half of the electrical input energy is lost as heat).
And that is the peak efficiency, when the motor is operating away from that point, at a different RPM, the efficiency is even lower. When the motor is stalled or free running (no load) then efficiency is 0% as no work is being done.

With that said, I think It may be a typo.
 
Barclay said:
The book described the experiment as lifting the mass 1m

Sorry, I initially read right past that. (that is one problem created by having to scroll back and forth when evaluating a lower post)

With that resolved, I don't see any errors in your calculations; so unless the two questions are meant to be totally independent of each other, I am as confused by the results as you are.
 
billy_joule said:
All your working is correct.

That's a relief.

JBA said:
I am as confused by the results as you are

I've finally met someone on the forum who is confused. I thought I was the only one.

So the book have messed up somewhere I think
 

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K