Energy transition of LiCl from flame test

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the energy transition of lithium chloride (LiCl) during a flame test, specifically the emission of red light. Participants identify that the transition occurs from energy level n=2 to n=1, which corresponds to the emission of photons. The conversation also highlights the distinction between hydrogen and lithium transitions, emphasizing that the Balmer series applies to hydrogen, while lithium's atomic number (Z=3) necessitates a different approach for energy calculations. The participants conclude that the lowest energy transition for lithium is indeed n=2 to n=1, but further calculations are needed to confirm if this transition falls within the red wavelength range.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic energy levels and electron transitions
  • Familiarity with the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom
  • Knowledge of the electromagnetic spectrum, particularly visible light
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics related to energy emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Balmer series and its application to hydrogen and other elements
  • Learn about the calculation of energy transitions using the Rydberg formula
  • Research the differences in electron configurations and transitions for multi-electron atoms
  • Explore the implications of atomic number (Z) on spectral lines and energy levels
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in atomic physics and the behavior of elements during flame tests will benefit from this discussion.

Jpyhsics
Messages
84
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


LiCl flame test is red.
a) define what process
b)and transition between which energy levels?2. The attempt at a solution
a)I believe that the process would be emission, as photons are emitted when energy is released
b)n=2 to n=1
I assumed that that would be the lowest energy transition, which would give us the greatest wavelength of visible light. My only question is why in the hydrogen spectrum is the transition from n=3 to n=2 red light, or anything to transition to n=2 is visible, whereas here would it be different as lithium has 3 e-? Would lithium also emit visible light from transition to n=2? So would n=3 to n=2 be the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jpyhsics said:
b)n=2 to n=1
I assumed that that would be the lowest energy transition,
Is your "assumption" based on fact; small quantum numbers imply larger or smaller energy changes?
 
Bystander said:
Is your "assumption" based on fact; small quantum numbers imply larger or smaller energy changes?
Well in our lecture our prof said that a small energy change is equal to small frequency and longer wavelength, and I know red is a longer wavelength in the visible spectrum.
 
Jpyhsics said:
Well in our lecture our prof said that a small energy change is equal to small frequency and longer wavelength, and I know red is a longer wavelength in the visible spectrum.
Would n=2 to n=1 be correct?
 
Lyman...Balmer...Paschen...Brackett ...Pfund...? Ring any bells?
 
So far nobody asked: what is Z for lithium?
 
Bystander said:
Lyman...Balmer...Paschen...Brackett ...Pfund...? Ring any bells?
so would it be n=3 to n=2? since the balmer series is visible light and all transitions to n=2?
 
Borek said:
So far nobody asked: what is Z for lithium?
The Z is 3
 
So can you apply hydrogen atom series directly to the energies of the lithium atom transitions?
 
  • #10
Borek said:
So can you apply hydrogen atom series directly to the energies of the lithium atom transitions?
No...?
 
  • #11
Jpyhsics said:
No...?
So what would I have to use?
 
  • #12
Jpyhsics said:
the balmer series
is for hydrogen. Think transition energy.
 
  • #13
Bystander said:
is for hydrogen. Think transition energy.
Well energy wise I am thinking that n=2 to n=1 transition would emit the least amount of energy, which would indicate a longer wavelength. So would that be right?
 
  • #14
Jpyhsics said:
n=2 to n=1 transition would emit the least amount of energy,
"Least?" :oldsurprised:
 
  • #15
"Red" is a reasonably well defined range of wavelengths, calculate if the 2→1 transition falls in that range.
 
  • #16
Borek said:
"Red" is a reasonably well defined range of wavelengths, calculate if the 2→1 transition falls in that range.
Or would this have to do with the sublevels? so the electron goes from 2p to 2s?
 
  • #17
I am a little confused at what everyone is trying to get at.
 
  • #18
Bystander said:
"Least?" :oldsurprised:
Then what would be considered the lowest energy transition?
 
  • #19
Jpyhsics said:
the lowest energy transition?
The "last" Δn=1 transition before the "continuum," ∞-1 to ∞-2, change in energy levels is infinitesimal.:wink:
 
  • #20
I told you - rather precisely - what to check. Have you tried?
 
  • #21
Borek said:
I told you - rather precisely - what to check. Have you tried?
Im not sure the bohr equation would work since it is for atoms with a single electron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K