Engineer stumped by pure math, need to find some way to get started

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of understanding mathematical concepts related to the Mellin Transform and functional spaces, specifically terms such as Lebesgue space, square integrable functions, isometry, and Hilbert spaces. The participant expresses confusion over these terms and seeks a systematic approach to grasping them, questioning whether a course in real analysis is necessary. Key insights include the definition of functional spaces as sets of functions with specific properties and the importance of square integrability in defining Hilbert spaces, which possess advantageous properties for analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus and integration techniques
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly vector spaces
  • Knowledge of real analysis fundamentals, including limits and continuity
  • Basic comprehension of functional analysis and its terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Hilbert spaces in functional analysis
  • Learn about Lebesgue integration and its significance in modern analysis
  • Explore the concept of isometries and their role in preserving distances in functional spaces
  • Investigate the applications of the Mellin Transform in signal processing and other fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students in advanced mathematics or signal processing who seek to deepen their understanding of functional spaces and related mathematical concepts.

lankman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I am reading some paper on Mellin Transform and its application in signal processing and I am totally stumped by phrases such as lebesgue space, square integrable, isometry, automorphism, measurable and essential supreme and such.

Of course, when I look them up one by one I sort of get the concept (although still very confused about why people would go through all that mess to define these concepts as such), but I would like to be comprehensive about it.

Where can I get a systematic understanding of these terms? Do I need a course in real analysis? If possible, can someone elaborate as to what a functional space mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of those words do imply real analysis.

A functional space is a set of functions having some particular property, where some "topology" is defined. Which usually means there is a way to measure how "far apart" two functions are. Very frequently functional spaces are linear, which means that for any two numbers a and b, and any two member-functions f and g, af + bg is also a member-function. In those space you typically have a scalar product (f, g), which is used to define the norm ||f|| = |(f, f)|, and the norm is used to define the metric r(f, g) = ||f - g||, which tells you how far apart f and g are.

Taking the space of square integrable functions on the interval [a, b], the scalar product of f and g is simply the definite integral of the product f(t)g(t) over the interval [a, b]. What is "square integrable"? This a function integral of whose square is finite, which simply means its norm is finite, so all the definitions are self-consistent.
 
lankman said:
Hi guys, I am reading some paper on Mellin Transform and its application in signal processing and I am totally stumped by phrases such as lebesgue space, square integrable, isometry, automorphism, measurable and essential supreme and such.

Of course, when I look them up one by one I sort of get the concept (although still very confused about why people would go through all that mess to define these concepts as such), but I would like to be comprehensive about it.

Where can I get a systematic understanding of these terms? Do I need a course in real analysis? If possible, can someone elaborate as to what a functional space mean?

One of the important things about square-integrability is that the space of square-

integrable functions, laid out as voko did, is a Hilbert space, and Hilbert spaces have

some very nice properties. To add a bit about norms, there are often many

different ones used ( and inequivalent topologically), reflecting the different notions

of what functions being closed to each other may mean.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K