Engineer Vs Physicist (DEATHMATCH )

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the debate between pursuing a degree in Engineering versus Physics. Participants share personal experiences, highlighting the high dropout rates in Physics programs compared to the perceived employability of Engineering graduates. Key points include the practical applications of Engineering, such as Mechanical Engineering and nanotechnology, versus the theoretical focus of Physics. The conversation emphasizes that neither field is inherently superior; rather, the choice depends on individual interests and career goals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic concepts in Physics and Engineering.
  • Familiarity with the differences between theoretical and applied sciences.
  • Knowledge of career pathways in STEM fields.
  • Awareness of the educational structure in university programs for both disciplines.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the curriculum differences between Mechanical Engineering and Physics majors.
  • Explore career opportunities in nanotechnology and nuclear sciences.
  • Study the dropout rates and challenges faced by Physics students in higher education.
  • Investigate the role of practical experience in Engineering versus theoretical knowledge in Physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students considering a career in STEM, educators advising on academic paths, and professionals in Engineering or Physics seeking to understand the perspectives of their counterparts.

neil_m
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Engineer Vs Physicist (DEATHMATCH!)

OK...i've seen some friendly comments on the similarities and differences between Engineering and Physics. I would like to hear from people in these fields and studying these fields to get defensive, get personal, but be serious (why not witty and funny ...but mature) about their major/profession/passion.
Could any member from either group post, and tell me why Engineering or Physics is THE way to go, and why it is undeniably better than the other.
(I am aware this might instigate some unpleasent fights, but as men and women of Science, it shall be only for the sake of experiment, because it should really come down to a draw...but for now, sum1 just start some shhhhh...uh ...poop)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not in either field =)
 
:biggrin: Neither am I (just feel like making some noise at this particular moment in time).
 
I studied theoretical physics at college and now i am studying applied physics. It seems to me that besides courses like electronics and simulations of dynamical systems, there is not much extra to learn when someone with a physics degree starts to study engineering. Keep in mind that i am referring to physical engineering like nanotechnology or nuclear sciences...

marlon
 
Well, let's see. First year there were 200 "physics majors." Second year there were 100. Third year 40, and 18 graduated witht the BS. Most transferred to engineering.

Some say they were the smart ones, because they figured out that they were not smart enough to finish the physics degree, so instead took the "more emplyable route."
 
Well I mean I don't really know much about engineering, but our lecture seems to like to give them immense crap.
I'm a second year physics student and, yes there is a pretty high drop out rate. Especially in second year because that is probably the biggest jump in terms of difficulty level.
But yeah Physics is pretty damn interesting and it has a lot of applications.
I mean it's pretty cool to know how the things you use operate, such as a guitar amp.
Anyway that's my two cents worth:)
 
At my school there is 6 or less, during year 3 and 4.
 
we have 30 or so graduate each year. Nice big department. Of course we also have 7,000 engineering majors who aren't smart enough to be physics majors, and then ten years down the road all think they've disproved relativity with common sense, except for the fact that they have no understanding whatsoever of the mathematics involved, and why relativity is so accurate. They make me angry. I don't try to show them the best way to build an airplane when i know nothing about airplane design.
 
I will be an engineer in a matter of 5 years. Whoo-pee. :D
 
  • #10
as a high school student who likes physics, i wanted to know what would be better?? the degree of engineering or a degree for becoming a physicist ( a physics major i guess ) ? also, what's the different between the two since they both deal with physics

thanks
 
  • #11
jai6638 said:
as a high school student who likes physics, i wanted to know what would be better?? the degree of engineering or a degree for becoming a physicist ( a physics major i guess ) ? also, what's the different between the two since they both deal with physics

thanks

Engineering seems to deal more with the mechanics of systems. Of course, that depends on which field of engineering you are interested in. For example, Mechanical Engineering would be much more centered around mechanisms such as robots or automobiles, while physics deals with specific cases and general laws.

Correct me if i am wrong.
 
  • #12
not to be an a-hole, but i am conducting a study here.
I want to see some Physicist VS Engineer action.
In here we know what an engineer and physicist do, we want to know who's better and why they think that.
COME ON PEOPLE!
LETS GET THIS STARTED!
 
  • #13
There is no "better" course to major in. That is absurd. It is strictly subjective.
 
  • #14
neil_m, this may not be the cat-fight you'd hoped for, but let me say this anyway :

I graduated from college with an engineering degree and am currently doing a PhD in physics. I would highly recommend this route for folks who are physics inclined. You can always take a whole bunch of physics courses with an engineering major. Over this period, you get to assess if you are still as interested in physics as you were, when you were an ignorant high schooler, and you'll figure out if you're cut out for it. Most are not. And even if you are, you get to learn a lot of cool engg stuff that you'll never see if you major in physics. And you can learn most college physics by yourself...just buy yourself a Resnick & Halliday and a few other books from the library are useful.

If you can't handle most of Resnick by yourself, you're not cut out for physics.

If you are happy with your engineering path and wish to study it further or get a job in the line, that's not especially difficult (relatively speaking); but if you still find that your heart is with physics, you can always do a PhD in physics...which is really the only way to learn any serious physics.

Of course, if you have an aversion to engineering (a true, head-in-the-clouds theoretician...which at the high-school level mostly means you're stupid), go ahead and get a degree in physics.

PS : I've used some specifically inflammatory phrases (in bold) for the benefit of neil_m's experiment.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
I'm neither, though I've dated an engineer, but no physicists. I have a "thing" for engineers...they're both booksmart and practical. I think being an engineer will get you more women than being a physics major. Is that sufficient justification for you all to become engineers? :biggrin:
 
  • #16
neil_m said:
not to be an a-hole, but i am conducting a study here.
I want to see some Physicist VS Engineer action.
In here we know what an engineer and physicist do, we want to know who's better and why they think that.
COME ON PEOPLE!
LETS GET THIS STARTED!
neil_m, I think you will find that people here (for the most part) are serious about school, are mature (doesn't mean that they don't like to have fun) and they know that the quickest way to get a thread closed is for people to start flinging insults. It's not going to happen.
 
  • #17
(for dekoi, and anyone else who may not have understood the point of this)

I am not only referring to Engineering and Physics as majors... I am asking if anyone STUDYING or who are actually IN the fields to post their OPINIONS, on these topics.
What you appear to be saying is anyones opinion on that is absurd, which makes you appear not very open minded.
Letsee quoting MYSELF at the beginning of this thread "...it shall be only for the sake of experiment, because it should really come down to a draw..." so ummm I DO NOT THINK THAT ONE IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER IN MY OPINION, but I would like to hear what other people have to say, and allow them to be free with it (but back up what they have to say with good and valid reasons and facts --or GOOD humor at least)
Now, if you STILL have a problem then don't post. Otherwise pick a side for fun and sling some mud at it, and pick another and say why you THINK it is better.
(so dekoi, lighten up, and have some fun, no hard feelings...peace)
 
  • #18
Evo said:
the quickest way to get a thread closed is for people to start flinging insults. It's not going to happen.

I thought this was for fun...and not meant to provoke any serious insult trading.
 
  • #19
Gokul43201 said:
I thought this was for fun...and not meant to provoke any serious insult trading.

That was my interpretation too...all in good fun, sort of like a pie fight. :-p
 
  • #20
As Rosanne Rosanna Danna would say "never mind".

Hey, I just finished eating sushi, some marinated bell peppers, onion, cucumber and feta cheese and then topped it off with some chunky peanut butter. I think I'm going to die.
 
  • #21
WHOA WHOA WHOA...
I never said start a cat fight, i never said get insulting.
I said that COULD happen, because OBVIOUSLY some people would misunderstand, and not be able refrain from acting like children. Flinging insults just shows you have nothing intelligent to say to back up an opinion you have about a PERSONAL preference. Therefore it makes ot easy to disregard stupid comments or opinions.
I enjoy hearing intelligent people say what's on their mind, and what they think about a science so magnificent. I am VERY serious about school, I don't think a discussion on Physics and Engineering that is encouraging personal feelings towards Engineering or Physics (NOT individuals) should be considered immature. Therefore this thread need not be closed.
Gokul43201 : Thank you for your advice. I seriously will consider that. As a matter of fact that is pretty much what I had in mind. I was looking at either General/Integrated Engineering, or Engineering Physics.
The only aversion to Engineering is I am afraid that if I specialise in a particular field, I may miss out on a lot of the general Physics, but as you said, I suppose if I am truly interested in Physics I should make time and study it on my own. Perhaps go for postgraduate study in Physics after I get an Engineering degree. Other than that I am very interested in Engineering. Thanks to people here, I have gotten a lot of reassurance that making an early decision is not detrimental to what you major in.
I am actually finished high school, and stuying some first year University Physics and Mathematics on my own, in my year off (financial reasons).
I wouldn't say I am ignorant to the structure of University study, but I certainly don't know everything, or else I wouldn't be asking you guys.
Thanks a lot everyone, and to be clear let there be NO personal insulting.
I apologise, I was trying to make it fun, I thought courtesy would go without saying among intelligent people, but perhaps i am wrong.
I hope I can still get some feedback form people who ARE capable of making some comments on why they THINK of Physics or Engineering, WITHOUT getting personal with EACH OTHER.
 
  • #22
Put it this way.. physics and math majors sit atop the food chain and look down on everybody else :D

Everyone knows art majors are at the very bottom, though ;)
 
  • #23
thank you moonbear, lol.
definitely like a pie fight. Only more fun cus there's more physics to this than projectile mechanics! ;)
come on people I know people who say science is not fun or cool.
I DISAGREE
lets have some FUN!
 
  • #24
I’d say that for most a BS in engineering is a great choice for advanced study of any field. For the high intellect theorist or mathematician it would be a waste of time.

If you took your fathers watch apart to see how it worked when you were 8 years old, you’re an engineer. If, at an earlier age, you looked in a mirror and wondered why your ears were on the wrong side, you’re a physicist. I have no idea what drives a mathematician, only envy.
 
  • #25
mathlete said:
Put it this way.. physics and math majors sit atop the food chain and look down on everybody else :D

Everyone knows art majors are at the very bottom, though ;)

you are dead right, DOWN WITH ARTS, DOWN WITH ARTSIES HAAHAHAHAHA

If you took your fathers watch apart to see how it worked when you were 8 years old, you’re an engineer. If, at an earlier age, you looked in a mirror and wondered why your ears were on the wrong side, you’re a physicist. I have no idea what drives a mathematician, only envy

you are also right, oh so many times di i take brand new electronics my parents and i took them apart, sometimes i put them back together and they didnt always work hehe such is the price for learning i guess, my dad always said i'd make a good engineer, well I'm taking engineering, i don't know about the being good part yet but... if you want to waste your time in a lab or in an office be in physics, if not and you like th outdoors pick a trade, but we proud, we few, shall become engineers DOWN WITH ARTSIES haha
 
  • #26
People get driven into mathematics because they see beauty, not necessarily simplicity, within numbers.

I enjoy numbers very much, but my bad background isn't helping much.

Also, I try and normally don't look down on students in other programs. I hate competitiveness within programs on which is better or which is a waste of time.

Do what you love, and keep your trap shut.
 
  • #27
well i do agree with you. but this was the point of this thread. Dont take offense to it, in here forgive it. i just want to see some creative opinions.
Although I didn't include 'Mathematician' (Physicist and Engineers are essentially Mathematicians). Props to "pure" Mathematicians though...they study the very language of Physicists and Engineers (and pretty much anything else...but to stay on topic).
So no hard feelings... as Moonbear said its, "all good fun...like a pie fight"
;)
 
  • #28
Mmm...
Well, sounding odd by taking pre-mid courses, majoring at electrical engineering and physics, and studying psychology as a minor, I found taking a mojor in mathematics will help me in all the above much more than if i did not take it!

I found physics people and math people are the Giants at which the engineers stand on their shoulders to make theory "useful" to people walking in the streets. If i was "educatiojn minister" or whatever you call it i will make a law that every body at Uni has to take a minor in mathematics because it help in "engineering" the ideas in any other field.. from sciences fields to humanities to Arts...even in figuring our the proper steps to cook eggs...

Still, engineers are the practical people who intesect with human societies from solutions of need perspective, while physicist and mathematician are seeing it from "natural facts" perspective..

Quite honesly: This question sounds with non-sense in someways. Its like: Who is better to serve society: Medicine/Pharmacy people, or Chemistry/ Biology people...both are crucial steps...and that it is!
[I am thinking of growing a lo-o-ong beard, and "paint" it in white to look more as wiseman in my sayings... :approve: :biggrin: :smile: ]
 
  • #29
Moonbear said:
I'm neither, though I've dated an engineer, but no physicists. I have a "thing" for engineers...they're both booksmart and practical. I think being an engineer will get you more women than being a physics major. Is that sufficient justification for you all to become engineers? :biggrin:
ha ha ha :smile: I'm just the opposite-
I've dated physicists, but not engineers. In truth, I think it's fun to date the physicists, but I'd rather settle down with an engineer. :smile: Engineers are more reliable and stable.
 
  • #30
hahaha it's funny the different things that are talked about.
I'd say generally a lot of physics students can bore you ****less in a second.
While engineers don't have time to bore you because they're too busy trying to get lucky ;) engineers = 80% are amoral
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K