England vs Ecuador: 0-0 Score at Half Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The match between England and Ecuador ended 0-0 at halftime, with England's performance criticized as unconvincing. Concerns were raised about the team's ability to handle the heat, with comparisons made to past tournaments in hotter conditions. Discussions highlighted the need for better management, particularly regarding player support for Rooney and ineffective substitutions by coach Sven. Many participants expressed frustration with England's underwhelming play and questioned the team's potential against stronger opponents. Overall, there is a consensus that England's talent is not being maximized due to poor tactical decisions and a lack of confidence.
  • #61
Anttech said:
kettle calling the pot black... I THINK YOU WILL FIND THIS IS EXACTLY THE WAY YOU HAVE BEEN DEGRADING THIS THREAD. I have not changed my stance..

Well, if this is the only reaction you can come up with...ok, whatever...it is very brave that your "stance" remains unchanged. Same here.

LOL Its hard FACT... Irrelevent IN YOUR OPPINION
HARD FACT...ERRR, yeah...in what journal was this published again ?

In future if you are trying to tell something to someone, it would be preferable if you actually say that... :smile: :smile: :smile:
Well, that only helps if the people you are talking to actually take the effort of LISTENING and not regurgitating their own opinion over and over again.

:smile:

madness... You are impossible
That's what my mother used to say as well.

marlon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
marlon, I have read what you have said.. I didnt aggree and don't aggree... and never will aggree with what you said. You come across as someone who know little to nothing about football..

HARD FACT...ERRR, yeah...in what journal was this published again ?
yeh the FIFA www site... They haven't beaten 1 top level Euro team since before euro2004.. is a statement which is backed up with fact... u don't seem to get that do you? it is a fact..

Again I won't be participating in this little sledging game of yours any longer
 
  • #63
I'd have to agree more with Anttech on this one, but I don't think either one will make it through.

Germany is riding the wave of being the host nation. USA did great in '94, SKorea did great in '02. In fact, considering France's performance since '98, maybe they're WC was due more to being host nation than talent. Still, I'd say Germany is very close to being a great team again. Countries like Brazil, Germany, and Italy never really rebuild, they just reload. They won't be good enough to get by Argentina, which is already a great team, right now, when it matters.

England is playing a lot worse than I would have expected. I really thought they had a good chance this year. They were the best team in Europe (if you discount Czech Republic which was obviously over rated) and the champion usually comes from the same continent as the host nation. I think they just got a lot weaker losing Owen, though. I'm hoping they get by Portugal, but there's no way they're getting by Brazil.

All things considered, I think that having the WC in Europe won't be as important as it usually is and you'll have an all-America final.
 
Last edited:
  • #64
Anttech said:
marlon, I have read what you have said.. I didnt aggree and don't aggree... and never will aggree with what you said.
Your point being ?

You come across as someone who know little to nothing about football..

Strange, i am thinking the exact same thing about you.

yeh the FIFA www site... They haven't beaten 1 top level Euro team since before euro2004.. is a statement which is backed up with fact... u don't seem to get that do you? it is a fact..
But i am not denying that, i am saying that this is irrelevant. Jeezus : learn to read and listen.

Again I won't be participating in this little sledging game of yours any longer
:smile:
God, it's like talking to an angry child.

Anyhow, please do feel free to do whatever you want to do.

marlon
 
  • #65
BobG said:
I'd have to agree more with Anttech on this one, but I don't think either one will make it through.
You agree on what exactly ?

Germany is riding the wave of being the host nation.
Well, being the host nation certainly is not a disadvantage but it does not say it all. The US did great in the last worldcup as well. Germany became WChamp in Italy as well...I mean, there are a lot of examples that show the reality is not as simple as it is being presented by Antech.

England is playing a lot worse than I would have expected. I really thought they had a good chance this year. They were the best team in Europe (if you discount Czech Republic which was obviously over rated) and the champion usually comes from the same continent as the host nation. I think they just got a lot weaker losing Owen, though. I'm hoping they get by Portugal, but there's no way they're getting by Brazil.
Yes but this shows that results obtained before the WCup do not say anything about what the achievement in the actual competition will be like. This is what i have been trying to explain to Anttech from the beginning.


marlon
 
  • #66
marlon said:
YGermany became WChamp in Italy as well...I mean, there are a lot of examples that show the reality is not as simple as it is being presented by Antech.

To be fair, Klinsman, Brehme, Matthäus, and Völler were all playing in Italy at the time.
 
  • #67
NateTG said:
To be fair, Klinsman, Brehme, Matthäus, and Völler were all playing in Italy at the time.

NOW that German team were Amazing!
 
  • #68
marlon said:
IMO, he is just a very lucky player, if you know what i mean.


marlon

I think it was pele who said that Joe cole would slot straight into the brazilian squad.

If you were to see joe cole play in the premeirship you would understand why your wrong, the man is truly gifted . His can on occasions show boat to much and at the wrong times, but he will be a great star of the future.
England is playing a lot worse than I would have expected. I really thought they had a good chance this year. They were the best team in Europe (if you discount Czech Republic which was obviously over rated) and the champion usually comes from the same continent as the host nation. I think they just got a lot weaker losing Owen, though. I'm hoping they get by Portugal, but there's no way they're getting by Brazil.

Brazil won't last they've lost it , they just aint good enuf this time round.They haven't got a defence and will go out in the semi finals

One of these teams will win it.
Argentina ,germany or england
 
Last edited:
  • #69
ukmicky said:
I think it was pele who said that Joe cole would slot straight into the brazilian squad.

If you were to see joe cole play in the premeirship you would understand why your wrong, the man is truly gifted . His can on occasions show boat to much and at the wrong times, but he will be a great star of the future.

I agree with the poster. Joe Cole is gifted, as with Steven Gerrad (The only England players I consider really good)

However, With the current way they are playing, I see it Immensly difficult for England to pass through. Never mind portugal, but either France or Brazil is next, and from what I've seen from Brazil's recovering Ronaldo and Zidane also, they will have to be at their UPMOST form to even stand a chance against them. And Portugal; they may have lost Deco, but a lot of gifted players are still avaliable in that team with Phillip Scolari on their back.

Sven Goran at the way he's going now, is not even a match for Scolari. I think its the MOST optimistic people who think that England are going to win. But, 40 years is a long time to keep saying 'our time is now'.

Bottom line: I really don't think England stand much of a chance in the quarter or semi finals.
 
  • #70
No one believed liverpool were good enough to win the champions leaque but they did.

When england last won the world cup they played rubbish right up to the semi finals.

England have got it in them to raise there game.
 
Last edited:
  • #71
Im too young to remember many world cups, but some football legend (can't remember who but was brazilian) said that the team that wins the world cup very rarely plays well until the latter stages of the tournemant. To be honest apart from the one mistake made by the england back four that let tenoirio through, equador never looked like they where going to score.

Fingers crossed Frank Lampard starts hitting the target, if he starts scoring we will win the world cup.
 
  • #72
ukmicky said:
One of these teams will win it.
Argentina ,germany or england

Dissaggree.. France could do it, actually any team that is still in, is a potential winner... I think it will be a European team.

Joe Cole reminds me a lot of Gilespie (Ex-Newcastle) direct tricky player, but he is no ginola (best french player never to play for france).. Cole is a good player, not lucky but solid.. But IMO he is no where near the best in the England squad. Typically people who only watch a few games of football a year will come out with these statements, they see some tricky footwork and think wooow...
 
  • #73
One of these teams will win it.
Argentina ,germany or england

:smile: Where on Earth did Brazil go?
 
  • #74
Where on Earth did Brazil go?
Brazil defence is crap.. But I wouldnt write them off
 
Last edited:
  • #75
The winning team will have the best defence.

Struck me last night...

I thought Brazil play a good back 4.

Key is to have your wing-backs (full-backs) pushing forward. If they don't, you'll get caught out in the middle with them playing people onside when the centre-backs are stepping forward.

iirc, the Germans have problems keeping this back 4 tight.

Missed the French game, but with Gallas and Silvestre next to him in the middle I doubt they have this trouble.

I think England will have no problems if Neville comes back - also adds the link up play to Becks.

All in all, it's sorting itself out.

Normal service - all the usual teams through, with Spain and the Dutch falling short again :biggrin:

(And on defence, Argies may fall short with the fitness of Heinze)
 
  • #76
Missed the French game, but with Gallas and Silvestre next to him in the middle I doubt they have this trouble.
Yeap no problems, France controlled the game from the back
 
  • #77
Just a self-defense
 
  • #78
Anttech said:
Brazil defence is crap.. But I wouldnt write them off

The english people said the exact last thing last world cup when they were up against them. Look what happened.

I still can't believe you're putting Brazil off the world cup. As it looks now, I don't see any team realistically catching up with Brazil, with argentina coming only a tiny bit close
 
  • #79
I didnt write them off...:confused:
 
  • #80
NateTG said:
To be fair, Klinsman, Brehme, Matthäus, and Völler were all playing in Italy at the time.
Yes, but that goes for Brazil, Argentina, top French players as well...Point is that germany won the WCup in a foreign country and that is all there is too it. This example was just to counter one of Anntech's immature Germany bashing "arguments" that are based upon personal dislike.

marlon
 
  • #81
Bladibla said:
The english people said the exact last thing last world cup when they were up against them. Look what happened.

I still can't believe you're putting Brazil off the world cup. As it looks now, I don't see any team realistically catching up with Brazil, with argentina coming only a tiny bit close
Ofcourse, you are completely right. Any one saying that Brazil is a crappy team or has crappy defense or offense or whatever is just full of s**t. Abviously, one should not take into account such hollow remarks because they clearly contradict with obtained results and that is the ONLY thing that matters : OBTAINING HONEST RESULTS. Not, playing like a fool like the Italians.

marlon
 
  • #82
Brazil are weak in defence. Their upcoming game against France should really test them.
 
Last edited:
  • #83
marlon said:
Any one saying that Brazil is a crappy team or has crappy defense or offense or whatever is just full of s**t.

You're not thinking logically, Marlon. You're correct in saying that by claiming Brazil is a crap team in defence or offence, people are quite clearly contradicting themselves. However, have you watched Brazil in their last game against Ghana? Their defence cracked and Ghana should have had scored. Furthermore, they haven't really played against any threatening team.
 
Last edited:
  • #84
DM said:
You're not thinking logically, Marlon. You're correct in saying that by claiming Brazil is a crap team in defence or offence, people are quite clearly contradicting themselves. However, have you watched Brazil in their last game against Ghana? Their defence cracked and Ghana should have had scored. Furthermore, they haven't really played against any threatening team.
True

marlon
 
  • #85
DM said:
Brazil are weak in defence. Their upcoming game against France should really test them.

Point proven
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
661
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K