Entangled Particles and the Hadron Collider?

In summary: The superposition principle implies that an object can be in a superposition of two states. This is written as |a>|b> for a single particle, and |a>|b>+1 for an entangled particle. However, if the two states are the same, then destructive interference occurs and the object is eliminated from consideration.
  • #1
KooperScooper
1
0
If one was to entangle two particles and either send the two particles at each other, or send one of the entangled particles and observe the other; what do you think might happen?
If there are any problems with getting an entangled particle into the Hadron Collider, please say so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You say "send one of the entangled particles", but where are you sending that particle? Perhaps you can clarify.
 
  • #3
Entangled in which way?
KooperScooper said:
If there are any problems with getting an entangled particle into the Hadron Collider
Neglecting some technical issues: you could send them in, but no matter how they are entangled, accelerating them in a particle accelerator would make them lose their entanglement quickly.

If you let two entangled particles collide at high energy, nothing special happens (again independent on the details). You get nothing you won't see in other collisions as well.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #4
mfb said:
Entangled in which way?
Neglecting some technical issues: you could send them in, but no matter how they are entangled, accelerating them in a particle accelerator would make them lose their entanglement quickly.

If you let two entangled particles collide at high energy, nothing special happens (again independent on the details). You get nothing you won't see in other collisions as well.

Is that because the collision process effectively measures the spins, or because the collision outcomes don't depend on the spins, or some other reason?

For example, suppose that one of the possible collision outcomes is phased 180 degrees if the spin is up instead of down (but otherwise the collision doesn't depend on the spins). Then you would expect to never detect that phased outcome, because the two halves of the entangled state destructively interference on it. Where does that example fall apart?
 
  • #5
Strilanc said:
For example, suppose that one of the possible collision outcomes is phased 180 degrees if the spin is up instead of down (but otherwise the collision doesn't depend on the spins). Then you would expect to never detect that phased outcome, because the two halves of the entangled state destructively interference on it. Where does that example fall apart?

Phased 180% relative to what? Destructive interference only occurs with superposition's of the same particle - leaving aside the issue of bosons and fermions. Two different particles, in general, do not destructively interfere.

Reading popularisations doest convey what entanglement really is.

Given an object that can be in two states |a> and |b> then if object 1 is in state |a> and object 2 state |b> that is written as state |a>|b>. Conversely if object 1 is in state |b> and object 2 in state |a> that is written as |b>|a>. But the superposition principle implies it can also be in a superposition of those states ie 1/root 2 |a>|b> + 1/root 2 |b>|a>. Since |a> and |b> are two different states there is no way for them to destructively interfere. Now if they were the same state - then you get the interesting effects of bosons and fermions you can read up about.

Analysing collision processes is often done with the aid of the so called S matrix:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #6
bhobba said:
Phased 180% relative to what?

Phased 180 degrees as in a Z gate controlled by the spin being applied. The phase of the parts of the superpositions where the entangled spin is up get multiplied by -1.

bhobba said:
Destructive interference only occurs with superposition's of the same particle - leaving aside the issue of bosons and fermions. Two different particles, in general, do not destructively interfere.

Two particle systems can undergo interference. The particles won't cancel each other out, since that would violate unitarity, but you can set up experiments where multiple paths destructively interfering prevent the pair from appearing in certain positions just as you can with a single particle.

bhobba said:
Reading popularizations doesn't convey what entanglement really is.

My understanding of entanglement doesn't come from pop science, it's from https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521635039/?tag=pfamazon01-20. Basically I know some of the linear algebra parts but very little of the differential equation parts.

For example, I'm thinking of the two particle system as a two-or-more qubit system. I know I can do multi-qubit interference things, like superdense coding and pseudotelepathy (awful name for a type of bell inequality), so the same should be true of particles.

bhobba said:
Given an object that can be in two states |a> and |b> then if object 1 is in state |a> and object 2 state |b> that is written as state |a>|b>. Conversely if object 1 is in state |b> and object 2 in state |a> that is written as |b>|a>. But the superposition principle implies it can also be in a superposition of those states ie 1/root 2 |a>|b> + 1/root 2 |b>|a>. Since |a> and |b> are two different states there is no way for them to destructively interfere. Now if they were the same state - then you get the interesting effects of bosons and fermions you can read up about.

Right, what I'm asking is if the collision process involves operations that send states to multiple outputs, and if the two states that are entangled might have overlapping outputs from those operations, and this would interfere. Like, if collision happens to do something isomoorphic to running part of the state through a Hadamard gate.

bhobba said:
Analysing collision processes is often done with the aid of the so called S matrix:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix

That's... going to take a while to digest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Strilanc said:
Right, what I'm asking is if the collision process involves operations that send states to multiple outputs, and if the two states that are entangled might have overlapping outputs from those operations, and this would interfere. Like, if collision happens to do something isomoorphic to running part of the state through a Hadamard gate.

Then you can see from the math if they are different states entanglement doesn't create destructive interference. Only if the states are the same can such occur - and that's how you get things like the Pauli Exclusion principle for Fermions.

Strilanc said:
Is that because the collision process effectively measures the spins, or because the collision outcomes don't depend on the spins, or some other reason?

I don't know why you keep mentioning spins - spins usually have nothing to do with particle collisions - but I have to say its not an area I am personally into. For sure though particle collisions do not measure spin in general.

Strilanc said:
That's... going to take a while to digest.

Indeed. You might like to study QFT it forms part of. I am going through the following book right now and am pretty impressed:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/019969933X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Strilanc said:
Is that because the collision process effectively measures the spins, or because the collision outcomes don't depend on the spins, or some other reason?
High-energetic collisions with hadrons are nearly independent of spin, as the collisions happen between partons within and you cannot control their spin anyway.

For electron-positron collisions spin is important, but there are just two options for the relative alignment. And you can control that with polarized beams as well, no need to have entangled particles.
 
  • #9
mfb said:
High-energetic collisions with hadrons are nearly independent of spin, as the collisions happen between partons within and you cannot control their spin anyway.

For electron-positron collisions spin is important, but there are just two options for the relative alignment. And you can control that with polarized beams as well, no need to have entangled particles.

Thanks.

I'm surprised you can't do anything interesting by entangling the colliding particles into 1/sqrt(2) (|alignments-agree> + fun-phase-factor |alignments-disagree>).
 

What are entangled particles?

Entangled particles are a phenomenon in quantum mechanics where two particles become connected in such a way that the state of one particle is dependent on the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. This means that when one particle is observed or measured, the state of the other particle will also be determined, even if they are separated by vast distances.

What is the Hadron Collider?

The Hadron Collider, also known as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is the world's largest and most powerful particle accelerator. It is located at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland and was built to study the fundamental building blocks of matter and the basic forces that govern them.

Why is the Hadron Collider important?

The Hadron Collider allows scientists to study the behavior of particles at extremely high energies, recreating conditions similar to the Big Bang. This allows for a better understanding of the universe and the fundamental laws of nature. It also helps to confirm or refute theories in physics and could potentially lead to the discovery of new particles.

What is the purpose of studying entangled particles with the Hadron Collider?

Studying entangled particles at the Hadron Collider can help to test the principles of quantum mechanics and potentially uncover new information about the fundamental nature of the universe. It can also aid in the development of new technologies, such as quantum computing, which relies on the principles of entanglement.

What are the potential applications of entangled particles and the Hadron Collider?

The potential applications of entangled particles and the Hadron Collider are vast and diverse. They include advancements in quantum computing, secure communication, and new medical technologies. Further research in this field could lead to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in various industries.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
560
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
582
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
866
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
706
Replies
5
Views
850
Replies
8
Views
908
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
899
Replies
6
Views
298
Back
Top