Understanding Entropy and Free Energy in Chemical Reactions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Gibbs Free Energy (G) in chemical reactions, specifically its role in determining equilibrium. When the free energy of the products equals that of the reactants, the system is at equilibrium, indicating a minimum free energy state. The participants clarify that Gibbs Free Energy is defined as the enthalpy minus the product of temperature and entropy (TS), and it represents the maximum useful work obtainable from a process. The equation Gtotal = Greactant + Gproduct is debated, emphasizing that at equilibrium, the changes in Gibbs Free Energy for reactants and products are equal and opposite.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gibbs Free Energy and its significance in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of enthalpy and entropy
  • Basic knowledge of chemical equilibrium principles
  • Ability to perform calculations involving molar mass and standard temperature and pressure (STP)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Gibbs Free Energy equation and its derivation
  • Learn about the relationship between Gibbs Free Energy and chemical equilibrium
  • Explore the concept of spontaneity in chemical reactions and the role of ΔG
  • Investigate practical applications of Gibbs Free Energy calculations in chemical processes
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals in the field of thermodynamics and chemical engineering seeking a deeper understanding of Gibbs Free Energy and its implications in chemical reactions.

MonsieurWise
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding why in a reaction, when the free energy G of the product equal the free energy G of the reactant, the reaction is at equilibrium. Here, as my book say, the system has reached its minimum free energy. I don't really get why... Could someone explain to me...? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh...never mind. It seems like the reaction just like the Delta G, not G, to be negative to be spontaneous, right? Now The only thing I don't get is:
Since:
Gtotal = Greactant + Gproduct
when Greactant decrease, Gproduct increase, so how can it say at equilibrium, "the system has reached minimum free energy"?
Thanks
 
MonsieurWise said:
... Now The only thing I don't get is:
Since:
Gtotal = Greactant + Gproduct
when Greactant decrease, Gproduct increase, so how can it say at equilibrium, "the system has reached minimum free energy"?
Thanks

Is it correct to say "Gtotal = Greactant + Gproduct"?

Gibbs Free Energy is the maximum amount of useful work you can obtain from a process not an inherent energy present in either the products or reactants. Where have you seen this equation? It's news to me.
 
Oh, it was in my chemistry book...
 
chemisttree said:
Gibbs Free Energy is the maximum amount of useful work you can obtain from a process not an inherent energy present in either the products or reactants. Where have you seen this equation? It's news to me.

The Gibbs free energy G is just the enthalpy minus TS. It's definitely an inherent property (a state function) of a substance.

MonsieurWise, the question is by what magnitude the Gibbs free energies of the reactants and the products increase and decrease. The magnitudes aren't constant; they depend on the amounts that already exist. At equilibrium, \Delta G_\mathrm{reactant} and \Delta G_\mathrm{product} are equal and opposite.
 
Mapes said:
The Gibbs free energy G is just the enthalpy minus TS. It's definitely an inherent property (a state function) of a substance.

And just how is that calculated? Say I've got 10 grams of hydrogen at STP... What Gibbs free energy is appropriate for that substance?
 
(10\,\mathrm{g})\left(\frac{1}{2.016} \frac{\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{g}}\right)\left[0\,\frac{\mathrm{J}}{\mathrm{mol}}-\left(298\,\mathrm{K}\right)\left(131\,\frac{\mathrm{J}}{\mathrm{mol}\cdot\mathrm{K}}\right)\right]\approx -190\,\mathrm{kJ}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K